A Unified Taxonomy of AI Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection: Integrating Learning Paradigms, Imaging Modalities, Evaluation Metrics, and Deployment Challenges

The past decade has seen an increase in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast cancer detection, which can only be called exponential, and it has revolutionized the accuracy and efficiency of breast cancer diagnosis. machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models have been extensively applied in various imaging modalities, including mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and even histopathology. It is also against this background that though there has been this kind of advancement, there are no systemic methodologies that have been established to classify and analyse these AI-grounded strategies in a more holistic kind of way. In general, in the present paper, we propose a unified and extended taxonomy in accordance with which AI approaches in the field of breast cancer detection might be classified as having four basic dimensions: learning paradigm (e.g., supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement learning), model architecture (e.g., SVM, CNN, GAN), diagnostic task (e.g., classification, segmentation, detection), and imaging modality. A systematic review of 25 recently published and peer-reviewed studies bought this taxonomy to the ground. This is a review that critically analyses the model performance, dataset usage and evaluation metrics, accuracy, area under curve (AUC), F1-score, precision and recall. In addition, the proposed taxonomy gives the association of specific AI methods with well-known publicly available datasets, such as BreaKHis, DDSM, MIAS, and BUSI, allowing one to fully understand the adequacy of models by imaging type. It displays tendencies, prejudices and not effectively used combinations of models and modalities as well. The paper describes the presence of critical open problems in the area, such as interpretability of models, generalizability, computational efficiency, and, whether they can be used in clinical or low-resource environments or not. The work can be used as a helpful reference to guide researchers, developers, and clinicians in the development of useful, efficient, and explainable AI-based diagnosis systems of breast cancer by providing a systematic taxonomy and highlighting the state-of-the-art plus the ongoing challenges. One may think of the taxonomy not as a summary of the current knowledge as of the paper publication date but as a road map of what is expected to happen in the sphere of AI-powered oncology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56975/jetir.v12i6.564428
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Unified Taxonomy of AI Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection: Integrating Learning Paradigms, Imaging Modalities, Evaluation Metrics, and Deployment Challenges

Nirbhay Kumar Mishra, Mayank Kumar Dr
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
AI in cancer detection
article

A Unified Taxonomy of AI Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection: Integrating Learning Paradigms, Imaging Modalities, Evaluation Metrics, and Deployment Challenges

Nirbhay Kumar Mishra, Mayank Kumar Dr
article en

Abstract

The past decade has seen an increase in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast cancer detection, which can only be called exponential, and it has revolutionized the accuracy and efficiency of breast cancer diagnosis. machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models have been extensively applied in various imaging modalities, including mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and even histopathology. It is also against this background that though there has been this kind of advancement, there are no systemic methodologies that have been established to classify and analyse these AI-grounded strategies in a more holistic kind of way. In general, in the present paper, we propose a unified and extended taxonomy in accordance with which AI approaches in the field of breast cancer detection might be classified as having four basic dimensions: learning paradigm (e.g., supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement learning), model architecture (e.g., SVM, CNN, GAN), diagnostic task (e.g., classification, segmentation, detection), and imaging modality. A systematic review of 25 recently published and peer-reviewed studies bought this taxonomy to the ground. This is a review that critically analyses the model performance, dataset usage and evaluation metrics, accuracy, area under curve (AUC), F1-score, precision and recall. In addition, the proposed taxonomy gives the association of specific AI methods with well-known publicly available datasets, such as BreaKHis, DDSM, MIAS, and BUSI, allowing one to fully understand the adequacy of models by imaging type. It displays tendencies, prejudices and not effectively used combinations of models and modalities as well. The paper describes the presence of critical open problems in the area, such as interpretability of models, generalizability, computational efficiency, and, whether they can be used in clinical or low-resource environments or not. The work can be used as a helpful reference to guide researchers, developers, and clinicians in the development of useful, efficient, and explainable AI-based diagnosis systems of breast cancer by providing a systematic taxonomy and highlighting the state-of-the-art plus the ongoing challenges. One may think of the taxonomy not as a summary of the current knowledge as of the paper publication date but as a road map of what is expected to happen in the sphere of AI-powered oncology.

Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative ResearchVol. 12(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.