Co-creation in the public sector for developing health-promoting activity spaces in local communities: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ experiences

Co-creation is increasingly being applied in the public sector. Yet, there is limited knowledge of how stakeholders experience participating in public sector-driven co-creation. To gain in-depth insights into this, group interviews were conducted with 56 stakeholders involved in the co-creation of activity spaces across six municipalities. The results illustrate three trade-off situations that emerged during the process: iteration versus solution, innovation versus convention, and flexibility versus planning. The findings emphasize the importance of balancing these trade-off situations for beneficial co-creation processes to achieve optimal results. Success requires joint reflection and continuous communication among all stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Practice and Research
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2025.2516546
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-creation in the public sector for developing health-promoting activity spaces in local communities: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ experiences

Emily Moe, Charlotte Skau Pawlowski, Emma Charlott Andersson Nordbø, Camilla Ihlebæk et al.
1 citations
Planning Practice and Research
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
article

Co-creation in the public sector for developing health-promoting activity spaces in local communities: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ experiences

Emily Moe, Charlotte Skau Pawlowski, Emma Charlott Andersson Nordbø, Camilla Ihlebæk, Ingeborg Pedersen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Co-creation is increasingly being applied in the public sector. Yet, there is limited knowledge of how stakeholders experience participating in public sector-driven co-creation. To gain in-depth insights into this, group interviews were conducted with 56 stakeholders involved in the co-creation of activity spaces across six municipalities. The results illustrate three trade-off situations that emerged during the process: iteration versus solution, innovation versus convention, and flexibility versus planning. The findings emphasize the importance of balancing these trade-off situations for beneficial co-creation processes to achieve optimal results. Success requires joint reflection and continuous communication among all stakeholders.

Planning Practice and ResearchVol. 40(5)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-creation in the public sector for developing health-promoting activity spaces in local communities: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ experiences — Emily Moe, Charlotte Skau Pawlowski, et al. · Planning Practice and Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS