Swiss-German Additive Focus Particle auch in bi-/multilingual Speakers: The Role of Language Typology, Language Dominance and Proficiency

Prior research on information structure has yielded differences in the use of cohesive devices to highlight additive relations by speakers of Romance and Germanic languages (Dimroth et al., 2010). We investigated the focusing function of the additive particle auch [also/too/as well] in Swiss German-French (n = 71) and Swiss German-Italian (n = 70) bilinguals. Standard German (n = 40) and Swiss German (n = 40) monolinguals served as comparison groups. Participants retold related events shown in a video stimulus. Information was also gathered on language dominance and proficiency. The dependent variable was whether auch was placed left to the entitysubject (auch herr rot geht schlafen [mister red too goes to sleep]), the alternative being its positioning after the finite verb (herr rot geht auch schlafen [mister red goes to sleep, too]). German shares the left-of-entity position with Italian and prefers the post-finite-verb position, which is shared with French. The left-of-entity position of the additive focus particle is not shared with English. We tested the effects of the other main language (French or Italian), language dominance, proficiency in the main languages and proficiency in English and French as third languages (L3s). While the comparison groups show similar results regarding the left-of-entity positioning of auch, bilingual data show that this position is more used by Swiss German-Italian speakers. Moreover, the more proficient in German and dominant in Swiss German both groups of bilinguals are, the more they use auch in this position. Proficiency in L3s is not associated with the syntactic position of auch. The discussion focuses on the degree to which our findings can be understood as suggesting crosslinguistic influences. Furthermore, we address the methodological challenges in estimating the potential effect of L3 proficiency on the positioning of the additive particle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.127
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swiss-German Additive Focus Particle auch in bi-/multilingual Speakers: The Role of Language Typology, Language Dominance and Proficiency

Audrey Bonvin, Raphael Berthelé, Giulia Berchio
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Swiss-German Additive Focus Particle auch in bi-/multilingual Speakers: The Role of Language Typology, Language Dominance and Proficiency

Audrey Bonvin, Raphael Berthelé, Giulia Berchio
article en

Abstract

Prior research on information structure has yielded differences in the use of cohesive devices to highlight additive relations by speakers of Romance and Germanic languages (Dimroth et al., 2010). We investigated the focusing function of the additive particle auch [also/too/as well] in Swiss German-French (n = 71) and Swiss German-Italian (n = 70) bilinguals. Standard German (n = 40) and Swiss German (n = 40) monolinguals served as comparison groups. Participants retold related events shown in a video stimulus. Information was also gathered on language dominance and proficiency. The dependent variable was whether auch was placed left to the entitysubject (auch herr rot geht schlafen [mister red too goes to sleep]), the alternative being its positioning after the finite verb (herr rot geht auch schlafen [mister red goes to sleep, too]). German shares the left-of-entity position with Italian and prefers the post-finite-verb position, which is shared with French. The left-of-entity position of the additive focus particle is not shared with English. We tested the effects of the other main language (French or Italian), language dominance, proficiency in the main languages and proficiency in English and French as third languages (L3s). While the comparison groups show similar results regarding the left-of-entity positioning of auch, bilingual data show that this position is more used by Swiss German-Italian speakers. Moreover, the more proficient in German and dominant in Swiss German both groups of bilinguals are, the more they use auch in this position. Proficiency in L3s is not associated with the syntactic position of auch. The discussion focuses on the degree to which our findings can be understood as suggesting crosslinguistic influences. Furthermore, we address the methodological challenges in estimating the potential effect of L3 proficiency on the positioning of the additive particle.

Journal of the European Second Language AssociationVol. 9(1)
University of Fribourg (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.