The normative chaos of the global arena. The COVID-19 pandemic as a litmus test for the health emergency management and global health systems

The paper highlights how the normative and institutional anarchy of the global arena, where opposite practical and political logic and conflicting values are often at play, prevents any significant realization of principles of health justice or substantive conception of health and well-being. This point is illustrated by focusing on problems related to the COVID-19 global response: the characterization of individual and population health and differences and asymmetries in national healthcare systems. The paper suggests that any bioethical framework that aspires to evaluate global health questions cannot avoid focusing on the problem of social and political domination: Both the mitigation of health iniquities and global acknowledgment of a minimal conception of good health and well-being might benefit from the fulfillment of another crucial task: minimizing and mitigating asymmetries of power and situations of dependency among different countries, international institutions and economic stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Ethics
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2025.2512093
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The normative chaos of the global arena. The COVID-19 pandemic as a litmus test for the health emergency management and global health systems

Ndidi Victoria Nwaneri, Corrado Piroddi
Journal of Global Ethics
Global Security and Public Health
article

The normative chaos of the global arena. The COVID-19 pandemic as a litmus test for the health emergency management and global health systems

Ndidi Victoria Nwaneri, Corrado Piroddi
article en

Abstract

The paper highlights how the normative and institutional anarchy of the global arena, where opposite practical and political logic and conflicting values are often at play, prevents any significant realization of principles of health justice or substantive conception of health and well-being. This point is illustrated by focusing on problems related to the COVID-19 global response: the characterization of individual and population health and differences and asymmetries in national healthcare systems. The paper suggests that any bioethical framework that aspires to evaluate global health questions cannot avoid focusing on the problem of social and political domination: Both the mitigation of health iniquities and global acknowledgment of a minimal conception of good health and well-being might benefit from the fulfillment of another crucial task: minimizing and mitigating asymmetries of power and situations of dependency among different countries, international institutions and economic stakeholders.

Journal of Global EthicsVol. 21(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Goethe-Institute United Kingdom (GB), Tampere University (FI)
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto, Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.