Rapid emplacement of the Keaīwa Lava Flow of 1823 from the Great Crack in the Southwest Rift Zone of Kīlauea volcano
The Keaīwa Lava Flow of 1823 in the Southwest Rift Zone of Kīlauea volcano is unusual for its expansive pāhoehoe sheet flow morphology and lack of constructive vent topography, despite having a similar tholeiitic basalt composition to other lavas erupted from Kīlauea. This lava flow issued from a ~ 10-km-long continuous fissure now known as the Great Crack, and has an unusually thin sheet flow morphology with margin thicknesses of ~15–110 cm (average of 42 cm). Based on field observations of the lava flow at its fissure vent (e.g., drain-back features), we propose that the Great Crack formed, or at least significantly widened, just prior to and syn -eruptively with this 1823 eruption. The absence of pyroclastic cones or spatter ramparts indicates that the eruption consisted of a rapid outpouring of relatively degassed lava as the fissure unzipped. The rapidly moving lava flow overtopped pre-existing tumuli and scoria cones (e.g., Lava Plastered Cones) up to ~10 m tall. Glass and whole-rock chemistry yield homogeneous compositions for the lavas erupted from the Great Crack, with glass compositions of 6.40 ± 0.10 wt% MgO and whole-rock compositions of 7.39 ± 0.07 wt% MgO. Lava pads erupted from a short western fissure system are richer in mafic minerals (e.g., olivine and clinopyroxene), and show slightly more MgO-rich whole-rock compositions (7.79 ± 0.05 wt%). MgO-in-glass thermometry on juvenile spatter yield eruption temperatures of 1153 ± 13 °C that are typical of Kīlauea lavas. Thus, the extensive sheet-like lava flow morphology is not a direct consequence of unusual magmatic or rheological conditions (i.e., low viscosity). Instead, the flow morphology is associated with high effusion rates caused by sudden drainage of uprift magma as it erupted from the Great Crack. Lava flow modeling using VolcFlow on a 2-m-resolution digital elevation model indicates that a minimum bulk effusion rate of ~5800 m 3 /s (~3500 m 3 /s dense rock equivalent) and a minimum flow velocity of ~11 m/s are required for the lava flow to overcome the topography of the Lava Plastered Cones. This effusion rate is among the highest inferred for eruptions in Hawaiʻi and around the world. This study highlights a less frequent eruption style at Hawaiian volcanoes characterized by a sudden outpouring of lava from an unusual fissure system. Local eyewitness accounts indicate that the 1823 eruption was preceded by seismicity. Given the complex magmatic-volcanic-tectonic relations across Kīlauea, we speculate that the south flank could have slipped over one or more events that ultimately triggered unzipping of the Great Crack and passive release of briefly stored uprift magma. An eruption similar to 1823 at Kīlauea or Mauna Loa, with an eruptive timeframe that could be as short as an hour, with high effusion rates and rapid flow front velocities, would not easily allow for a timely response. • The 1823 CE eruption was the first with written records in the Hawaiian Islands. • The 1823 CE eruption and opening of the Great Crack occurred concomitantly. • Lavas from the 1823 CE eruption are not rheologically or compositionally anomalous. • VolcFlow modeling replicate near perfectly the mapped 1823 CE flow field, and indicate a rapid emplacement of the lava.
Authors
- THOMAS B. SHEA (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7378-684X)
- Drew T. Downs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-1404)
- Andrea Tonato
- Karim Kelfoun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-3023)
Institutions
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
- Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans (FR)
- Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2025.108391
- Primary Topic
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Geological Survey