Seismic Risk, Structural Vulnerabilities, and Retrofitting Solutions: Lessons from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

The 7.8 magnitude earthquake in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, on February 6, 2023, exposed critical infrastructure deficiencies, particularly in areas near the East Anatolian Fault Zone. This study examines geological and structural factors that intensified the damage, including soil amplification reaching 2.5 in sedimentary basins, significantly increasing ground shaking. Structural assessments show that pre-1999 buildings had over 45% failure rates due to inadequate reinforcement and shear wall deficiencies. Using probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and structural performance assessments, the effectiveness of retrofitting solutions like buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and base isolation is evaluated. A comparative analysis with Japan, the U.S. (California), and New Zealand highlights best practices for seismic resilience. The findings emphasize the need for integrating site-specific hazard assessments into Türkiye’s seismic codes and enforcing large-scale retrofitting programs to mitigate future earthquake risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1573919
Citations
3
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Risk, Structural Vulnerabilities, and Retrofitting Solutions: Lessons from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Osman Hansu, Aydın Oğuz
3 citations
Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
article

Seismic Risk, Structural Vulnerabilities, and Retrofitting Solutions: Lessons from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Osman Hansu, Aydın Oğuz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The 7.8 magnitude earthquake in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, on February 6, 2023, exposed critical infrastructure deficiencies, particularly in areas near the East Anatolian Fault Zone. This study examines geological and structural factors that intensified the damage, including soil amplification reaching 2.5 in sedimentary basins, significantly increasing ground shaking. Structural assessments show that pre-1999 buildings had over 45% failure rates due to inadequate reinforcement and shear wall deficiencies. Using probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and structural performance assessments, the effectiveness of retrofitting solutions like buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and base isolation is evaluated. A comparative analysis with Japan, the U.S. (California), and New Zealand highlights best practices for seismic resilience. The findings emphasize the need for integrating site-specific hazard assessments into Türkiye’s seismic codes and enforcing large-scale retrofitting programs to mitigate future earthquake risks.

Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü DergisiVol. 8(3)
Isles International University (IE), Gaziantep University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.