Comparison of methods for estimating reservoir sedimentation

ABSTRACT In the face of climate change, water scarcity, and changes in land use, efficient management of energy generation is essential to ensure national energy security. In the context of Joint Resolution ANA/ANEEL n° 127/2022, this study aimed to compare four methods for estimating reservoir sedimentation: comparison of Depth-Area-Volume curves (DAV), sedimentometric analysis, use of computer programs with simplified methods, and comparison of cross-sections, with DAV method as the reference. The results showed that all methods indicated a reduction in reservoir volume due to sedimentation, however the cross-section method presented closest values to the reference method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.302520240143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of methods for estimating reservoir sedimentation

Bernardo Lipski, Tobias Bleninger, Bruna Arcie Polli, Aline Guidolin da Luz et al.
1 citations
Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Comparison of methods for estimating reservoir sedimentation

Bernardo Lipski, Tobias Bleninger, Bruna Arcie Polli, Aline Guidolin da Luz, Elizabete Bugalski de Andrade Peixoto, Ana Lia Warcheski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the face of climate change, water scarcity, and changes in land use, efficient management of energy generation is essential to ensure national energy security. In the context of Joint Resolution ANA/ANEEL n° 127/2022, this study aimed to compare four methods for estimating reservoir sedimentation: comparison of Depth-Area-Volume curves (DAV), sedimentometric analysis, use of computer programs with simplified methods, and comparison of cross-sections, with DAV method as the reference. The results showed that all methods indicated a reduction in reservoir volume due to sedimentation, however the cross-section method presented closest values to the reference method.

Revista Brasileira de Recursos HídricosVol. 30
Institutos Lactec (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.