Identification of Psychosocial Risk Factors in Working in Confined Spaces: preparation of the questionnaire

Abstract Objective This study aimed to develop and validate the content of a questionnaire for identifying psychosocial risk factors in the performance of confined spaces workers, since so far there is no questionnaire available to access this context. Method This methodological study was developed from a literature review between 2010 and 2019 and semi-structured interviews with 50 workers who work in confined spaces, resulting in items that made up the initial version of the instrument. Results Participants in the questionnaire’s content validation process were 18 professionals working in confined spaces and 22 expert judges. The workers suggested few changes in 24 items, but they considered all relevant and comprehensive. There were 22 items remained unchanged and six new ones were included, totaling 45 items with a good content validity index. Conclusion More robust psychometric analyses are suggested for final validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202542e220009
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Psychosocial Risk Factors in Working in Confined Spaces: preparation of the questionnaire

Roberta Alvarenga Reis, Mônica Augusta Mombelli, Cláudia Benedita dos Santos, Fabio Scorsolini‐Comin
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Identification of Psychosocial Risk Factors in Working in Confined Spaces: preparation of the questionnaire

Roberta Alvarenga Reis, Mônica Augusta Mombelli, Cláudia Benedita dos Santos, Fabio Scorsolini‐Comin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to develop and validate the content of a questionnaire for identifying psychosocial risk factors in the performance of confined spaces workers, since so far there is no questionnaire available to access this context. Method This methodological study was developed from a literature review between 2010 and 2019 and semi-structured interviews with 50 workers who work in confined spaces, resulting in items that made up the initial version of the instrument. Results Participants in the questionnaire’s content validation process were 18 professionals working in confined spaces and 22 expert judges. The workers suggested few changes in 24 items, but they considered all relevant and comprehensive. There were 22 items remained unchanged and six new ones were included, totaling 45 items with a good content validity index. Conclusion More robust psychometric analyses are suggested for final validation.

Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Vol. 42
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Brasil (BR)
Fundação Araucária
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.