Asymmetric price adjustment over the business cycle

• In many retail prices, there are more small price increases than decreases. • Consumer inattention to small price changes can explain the asymmetry. • Shopping intensity and price attention are correlated over the business cycle. • Asymmetry in small price changes should vary over the business cycle. • Analyses of large retail price data and macro indicators confirm the hypothesis. Studies of micro-level price datasets find more frequent small price increases than decreases, which can be explained by consumer inattention because time-constrained shoppers might ignore small price changes. Recent empirical studies of the link between shopping behavior and price attention over the business cycle find that consumers are more (less) attentive to prices during economic downturns (booms). These two sets of findings have a testable implication: the asymmetry in small price changes should vary over the business cycle—it should diminish during recessions and strengthen during expansions. We test this prediction using a large US store-level dataset with more than 98 million weekly price observations for the years 1989–1997, which includes an 8-month recession period, as defined by the NBER. We compare price adjustments between periods of recession (high unemployment) and expansion (low unemployment). Focusing on small price changes, we find, consistent with our hypothesis, that there is a greater asymmetry in small price changes during periods of low unemployment compared to the periods of high unemployment, implying that firms’ price-setting behavior varies over the business cycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112450
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymmetric price adjustment over the business cycle

Mark Bergen, Avichai Snir, Sourav Ray, Daniel Lévy et al.
Economics Letters
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Asymmetric price adjustment over the business cycle

Mark Bergen, Avichai Snir, Sourav Ray, Daniel Lévy, Haipeng Chen, Elliot Charette, Weihong Zhao, Xiao Ling
article en

Abstract

• In many retail prices, there are more small price increases than decreases. • Consumer inattention to small price changes can explain the asymmetry. • Shopping intensity and price attention are correlated over the business cycle. • Asymmetry in small price changes should vary over the business cycle. • Analyses of large retail price data and macro indicators confirm the hypothesis. Studies of micro-level price datasets find more frequent small price increases than decreases, which can be explained by consumer inattention because time-constrained shoppers might ignore small price changes. Recent empirical studies of the link between shopping behavior and price attention over the business cycle find that consumers are more (less) attentive to prices during economic downturns (booms). These two sets of findings have a testable implication: the asymmetry in small price changes should vary over the business cycle—it should diminish during recessions and strengthen during expansions. We test this prediction using a large US store-level dataset with more than 98 million weekly price observations for the years 1989–1997, which includes an 8-month recession period, as defined by the NBER. We compare price adjustments between periods of recession (high unemployment) and expansion (low unemployment). Focusing on small price changes, we find, consistent with our hypothesis, that there is a greater asymmetry in small price changes during periods of low unemployment compared to the periods of high unemployment, implying that firms’ price-setting behavior varies over the business cycle.

Economics LettersVol. 254
Tbilisi State University (GE), University of Iowa (US), University of Minnesota (US), Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (US), Bar-Ilan University (IL), Emory University (US), Central Connecticut State University (US), Economic Research Centre (AZ), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Wilfrid Laurier University (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.