Oxidative Potential from Common Indoor Sources of Particulate Matter

Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OP<sub>DTT</sub>), glutathione consumption (OP<sub>GSH</sub>), and hydroxyl radical generation (OP<sub>OH</sub>). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OP<sup><i>m</i></sup> of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75-1.25×) or exceeded (1-6×) that of typical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OP<sub>DTT</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> and OP<sub>OH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> while OP<sub>GSH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m<sup>3</sup>, air change rate = 0.45 h<sup>-1</sup>, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> (8 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01696
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oxidative Potential from Common Indoor Sources of Particulate Matter

P. S. Ganesh Subramanian, Vishal Verma, Brent Stephens, Mohammad Heidarinejad et al.
7 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Air Quality and Health Impacts
8.40
article

Oxidative Potential from Common Indoor Sources of Particulate Matter

P. S. Ganesh Subramanian, Vishal Verma, Brent Stephens, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Saman Haratian, Dai Zhu-ying
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OP<sub>DTT</sub>), glutathione consumption (OP<sub>GSH</sub>), and hydroxyl radical generation (OP<sub>OH</sub>). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OP<sup><i>m</i></sup> of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75-1.25×) or exceeded (1-6×) that of typical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OP<sub>DTT</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> and OP<sub>OH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> while OP<sub>GSH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m<sup>3</sup>, air change rate = 0.45 h<sup>-1</sup>, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> (8 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(25)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.