The political economy of carbon farming: Analyzing agribusiness’ accumulation strategy and the imaginary of soil carbon markets
The global food regime plays a significant role in accelerating the climate crisis. Carbon Farming (CF) has emerged as a new strategy aimed at reducing emissions and removing carbon from the atmosphere. Major agribusiness corporations, such as BASF, Bayer, Cargill, Corteva, Syngenta, and Yara International, are driving the development and promotion of CF schemes as part of climate-smart agriculture. In this paper, we analyze their motivations, approaches, and the material and discursive practices behind this from a Cultural Political Economy perspective. Using a qualitative analysis of documents, websites and interviews we identify infrastructuring, assetization and incorporation as foundational components of the accumulation strategy, while robust carbon measurement, soil carbon markets , and co-benefits are key components of the imaginary related to CF. We conclude that although the concept of CF remains somewhat vague, it resonates with problematic patterns seen in other sectors, particularly regarding incumbency and the risk of mitigation deterrence. • Carbon Farming is an understudied topic in agri-climate policy. • Using Cultural Political Economy, we examine Carbon Farming imaginaries and accumulation strategies of agribusiness firms. • We identify material and discursive practices linked to climate-smart agriculture. • Findings enrich research on food regimes, mitigation deterrence, and incumbency.
Authors
- Tobias Haas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3363-3440)
- Sarah Hackfort (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-8759)
Institutions
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Research Institute for Sustainability at GFZ (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104123
- Citations
- 9
- Primary Topic
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.95
Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung