Toward a More Stable Supercontinent Columbia in the Statherian

Abstract During the mid‐Proterozoic, nearly all of Earth's continents collided to form supercontinent Columbia. However, the exact timing of its formation is still debated, with estimates ranging from 1.8 to 1.6 Ga. This period, known as the Statherian, is also debated for its affinity to either the Paleoproterozoic or Mesoproterozoic eras. To address these spatiotemporal uncertainties, here we present a reliable 1.70–1.68 Ga paleomagnetic pole from mafic dyke swarms in the North China Craton, enabling global paleogeographic comparison during this critical interval. Compared with paleopoles from the likely neighbor of the North Australian Craton, although these two cratons achieved proximity as early as 1.78 Ga, they underwent slight but significant adjustments in their relative positions between 1.73 and 1.65 Ga, consistent with geological evidence. Similar reconfigurations are observed between Laurentia and North Australia, suggesting that Columbia was gradually becoming more stable in configuration during the Statherian Period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl116097
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a More Stable Supercontinent Columbia in the Statherian

Chong Wang, Yebo Liu, Peng Peng, Johanna Salminen et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Toward a More Stable Supercontinent Columbia in the Statherian

Chong Wang, Yebo Liu, Peng Peng, Johanna Salminen, Uwe Kirscher, Ross N. Mitchell, Chenglong Deng
article en

Abstract

Abstract During the mid‐Proterozoic, nearly all of Earth's continents collided to form supercontinent Columbia. However, the exact timing of its formation is still debated, with estimates ranging from 1.8 to 1.6 Ga. This period, known as the Statherian, is also debated for its affinity to either the Paleoproterozoic or Mesoproterozoic eras. To address these spatiotemporal uncertainties, here we present a reliable 1.70–1.68 Ga paleomagnetic pole from mafic dyke swarms in the North China Craton, enabling global paleogeographic comparison during this critical interval. Compared with paleopoles from the likely neighbor of the North Australian Craton, although these two cratons achieved proximity as early as 1.78 Ga, they underwent slight but significant adjustments in their relative positions between 1.73 and 1.65 Ga, consistent with geological evidence. Similar reconfigurations are observed between Laurentia and North Australia, suggesting that Columbia was gradually becoming more stable in configuration during the Statherian Period.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(12)
University of Helsinki (FI), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Curtin University (AU), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Project, Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.