All in a day’s work: job demands and satisfaction in Australian early childhood education and care settings

Abstract Despite acknowledged demands and stresses associated with early childhood (EC) work, and high levels of attrition in the EC workforce, research often shows high ratings of job satisfaction. This article explores these discordant findings by applying Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model to explore educator-rated job satisfaction, stress, feeling rushed, and multiple demands using Time Use Diary (TUD) methodology in a sample of well-resourced EC centres. TUD records were completed by 321 educators for 20 randomly selected hours over 10 days of work, generating 3,512 h of data. Overall ratings were high (M = 7.2/10) for satisfaction and low (M = 3.8/10) for job demands, with variations across the day, and by type and number of work activities completed per hour. Demands reduced during ‘staff breaks’ and time spent ‘being with children’, and increased when ‘communicating with families’, providing ‘emotional support’, and other tasks. Although overall satisfaction was negatively correlated with demands ( r = − 0.40), relatively high ratings were maintained during periods of high job demands. Applying TUD methodology to the JD-R model provided more nuanced understandings of work demands than is possible through one-off surveys. Findings have important implications for supporting quality EC practice and reducing educator burnout and attrition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00855-z
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All in a day’s work: job demands and satisfaction in Australian early childhood education and care settings

Megan Gibson, Frances Press, Michael Bittman, Sandie Wong et al.
The Australian Educational Researcher
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

All in a day’s work: job demands and satisfaction in Australian early childhood education and care settings

Megan Gibson, Frances Press, Michael Bittman, Sandie Wong, Tamara Cumming, Jude Brown, Linda Joan Harrison
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite acknowledged demands and stresses associated with early childhood (EC) work, and high levels of attrition in the EC workforce, research often shows high ratings of job satisfaction. This article explores these discordant findings by applying Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model to explore educator-rated job satisfaction, stress, feeling rushed, and multiple demands using Time Use Diary (TUD) methodology in a sample of well-resourced EC centres. TUD records were completed by 321 educators for 20 randomly selected hours over 10 days of work, generating 3,512 h of data. Overall ratings were high (M = 7.2/10) for satisfaction and low (M = 3.8/10) for job demands, with variations across the day, and by type and number of work activities completed per hour. Demands reduced during ‘staff breaks’ and time spent ‘being with children’, and increased when ‘communicating with families’, providing ‘emotional support’, and other tasks. Although overall satisfaction was negatively correlated with demands ( r = − 0.40), relatively high ratings were maintained during periods of high job demands. Applying TUD methodology to the JD-R model provided more nuanced understandings of work demands than is possible through one-off surveys. Findings have important implications for supporting quality EC practice and reducing educator burnout and attrition.

The Australian Educational Researcher
Griffith University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of New England (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.