Transforming Seven Kinds of Relational Pain

Bringforthist therapy extends the systemic practices of Interventive Interviewing and applies the relational focus of the IPscope. We elaborate upon these frameworks, highlighting their sensitivity to locally shaped needs of family members through the notions of relational preferences and relational pain. Relational preferences refer to family members' normative expectations about their relationships (relationship "shoulds"), while relational pain refers to family members' experiences of unfulfilled hopes vis-à-vis their culturally situated relational preferences (relationship "can'ts"). We distinguish seven variations of unrealized preferences, which are aggravated by differing pathologizing patterns of interpersonal interaction. We label these as seven "M's" of relational pain: Misjudging, Misaligning, Misrecognizing, Misappropriating, Mistreating, Mistrusting, and Misgrieving. We discuss each of these in relation to seven corresponding "R's" that could bring forth relational healing, namely Reappraising, Realigning, Recognizing, Reappropriating, Revealing, Reconciling, and Re-membering. In addition, we outline prototypical interaction patterns to illustrate how these different forms of pain might be addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70043
Primary Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming Seven Kinds of Relational Pain

Shenae Samuels, Inés Sametband, Karl Tomm, Joaquín Gaete
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
article

Transforming Seven Kinds of Relational Pain

Shenae Samuels, Inés Sametband, Karl Tomm, Joaquín Gaete
article en

Abstract

Bringforthist therapy extends the systemic practices of Interventive Interviewing and applies the relational focus of the IPscope. We elaborate upon these frameworks, highlighting their sensitivity to locally shaped needs of family members through the notions of relational preferences and relational pain. Relational preferences refer to family members' normative expectations about their relationships (relationship "shoulds"), while relational pain refers to family members' experiences of unfulfilled hopes vis-à-vis their culturally situated relational preferences (relationship "can'ts"). We distinguish seven variations of unrealized preferences, which are aggravated by differing pathologizing patterns of interpersonal interaction. We label these as seven "M's" of relational pain: Misjudging, Misaligning, Misrecognizing, Misappropriating, Mistreating, Mistrusting, and Misgrieving. We discuss each of these in relation to seven corresponding "R's" that could bring forth relational healing, namely Reappraising, Realigning, Recognizing, Reappropriating, Revealing, Reconciling, and Re-membering. In addition, we outline prototypical interaction patterns to illustrate how these different forms of pain might be addressed.

Journal of Marital and Family TherapyVol. 51(3)
University of Calgary (CA), PolicyWise for Children & Families (CA), Mount Royal University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.