Implementation of welfare maximizing networks

Abstract We consider network formation, where some locations can be connected. Every network has a cost and every agent has an individual value of every network. A planner aims at implementing a welfare maximizing network and allocating the resulting cost, but information is asymmetric: agents are fully informed and the planner is ignorant. Full implementation in Nash and strong Nash equilibria is studied. We show the correspondence consisting of welfare maximizing networks and individually rational cost allocations is implementable. We construct a minimal Nash implementable, welfare maximizing, and individually rational solution in the set of upper hemi-continuous and Nash implementable solutions. It is not possible to implement solutions such as the Shapley value unless we settle for partial implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01611-z
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of welfare maximizing networks

Jens Leth Hougaard, Mich Tvede
Social Choice and Welfare
Game Theory and Applications
article

Implementation of welfare maximizing networks

Jens Leth Hougaard, Mich Tvede
article en

Abstract

Abstract We consider network formation, where some locations can be connected. Every network has a cost and every agent has an individual value of every network. A planner aims at implementing a welfare maximizing network and allocating the resulting cost, but information is asymmetric: agents are fully informed and the planner is ignorant. Full implementation in Nash and strong Nash equilibria is studied. We show the correspondence consisting of welfare maximizing networks and individually rational cost allocations is implementable. We construct a minimal Nash implementable, welfare maximizing, and individually rational solution in the set of upper hemi-continuous and Nash implementable solutions. It is not possible to implement solutions such as the Shapley value unless we settle for partial implementation.

Social Choice and WelfareVol. 66(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Sheffield (GB)
Carlsbergfondet, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation of welfare maximizing networks — Jens Leth Hougaard, Mich Tvede · Social Choice and Welfare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS