Unsteady Natural Convection and Entropy Generation in Thermally Stratified Trapezoidal Cavities: A Comparative Study

This study numerically investigates unsteady natural convection (NC) heat transfer (HT) and entropy generation (Egen) in trapezoidal cavities filled with two thermally stratified fluids. Both air-filled and water-filled configurations are analyzed to evaluate and compare their thermal performance under varying conditions. The cavities are characterized by a heated base, thermally stratified sloped walls, and a cooled top wall. The governing equations are numerically solved using the finite volume (FV) approach. The study considers a Prandtl number (Pr) of 0.71 for air and 7.01 for water, Rayleigh numbers (Ra) ranging from 103 to 5 × 107, and an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.5. Flow behavior is examined through various parameters, including temperature time series (TTS), average Nusselt number (Nu), average entropy generation (Eavg), average Bejan number (Beavg), and ecological coefficient of performance (ECOP). Three bifurcations are identified during the transition from steady to chaotic flow for both fluids. The first is a pitchfork bifurcation, occurring between Ra = 105 and 2 × 105 for air, and between Ra = 9 × 104 and 105 for water. The second, a Hopf bifurcation, is observed between Ra = 4.7 × 105 and 4.8 × 105 for air, and between Ra = 105 and 2 × 105 for water. The third bifurcation marks the onset of chaotic flow, occurring between Ra = 3 × 107 and 4 × 107 for air, and between Ra = 4 × 105 and 5 × 105 for water. At Ra = 106, the average HT in the air-filled cavity is 85.35% higher than in the water-filled cavity, while Eavg is 94.54% greater in the air-filled cavity compared to water-filled cavity. At Ra = 106, the thermal performance of the cavity filled with water is 4.96% better than that of the air-filled cavity. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing thermal systems using trapezoidal cavities and varying working fluids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061908
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsteady Natural Convection and Entropy Generation in Thermally Stratified Trapezoidal Cavities: A Comparative Study

Sidhartha Bhowmick, Suvash C. Saha, Md. Mahafujur Rahaman
3 citations
Processes
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
2.02
article

Unsteady Natural Convection and Entropy Generation in Thermally Stratified Trapezoidal Cavities: A Comparative Study

Sidhartha Bhowmick, Suvash C. Saha, Md. Mahafujur Rahaman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study numerically investigates unsteady natural convection (NC) heat transfer (HT) and entropy generation (Egen) in trapezoidal cavities filled with two thermally stratified fluids. Both air-filled and water-filled configurations are analyzed to evaluate and compare their thermal performance under varying conditions. The cavities are characterized by a heated base, thermally stratified sloped walls, and a cooled top wall. The governing equations are numerically solved using the finite volume (FV) approach. The study considers a Prandtl number (Pr) of 0.71 for air and 7.01 for water, Rayleigh numbers (Ra) ranging from 103 to 5 × 107, and an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.5. Flow behavior is examined through various parameters, including temperature time series (TTS), average Nusselt number (Nu), average entropy generation (Eavg), average Bejan number (Beavg), and ecological coefficient of performance (ECOP). Three bifurcations are identified during the transition from steady to chaotic flow for both fluids. The first is a pitchfork bifurcation, occurring between Ra = 105 and 2 × 105 for air, and between Ra = 9 × 104 and 105 for water. The second, a Hopf bifurcation, is observed between Ra = 4.7 × 105 and 4.8 × 105 for air, and between Ra = 105 and 2 × 105 for water. The third bifurcation marks the onset of chaotic flow, occurring between Ra = 3 × 107 and 4 × 107 for air, and between Ra = 4 × 105 and 5 × 105 for water. At Ra = 106, the average HT in the air-filled cavity is 85.35% higher than in the water-filled cavity, while Eavg is 94.54% greater in the air-filled cavity compared to water-filled cavity. At Ra = 106, the thermal performance of the cavity filled with water is 4.96% better than that of the air-filled cavity. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing thermal systems using trapezoidal cavities and varying working fluids.

ProcessesVol. 13(6)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Jagannath University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.