Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal: NOAA Policy Priorities for Efficacy and Risk Reduction

As the urgency to address the escalating climate crisis grows, innovative solutions for atmospheric carbon removal are being fast-tracked by the federal government, including marine carbon dioxide storage, referred to as marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR). The escalation of federal funding for, and development of, mCDR technologies far outpaces our understanding of the environmental risks and impacts these approaches may have on the ocean and climate. To ensure responsible mCDR development and minimize unintended repercussions, we propose that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) give top consideration to the following areas when shaping mCDR priorities: 1) deep-sea research; 2) mCDR environmental risk analysis and impact; and 3) quality-assured measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification methods. In particular, avoiding environmental risk to the deep ocean should be prioritized. These actions will ensure that NOAA meets its stated objectives of evaluating all mCDR pathways for safety and efficacy and supporting foundational research on the ocean’s baseline functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Policy & Governance
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg260103
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal: NOAA Policy Priorities for Efficacy and Risk Reduction

Jennifer A. Jordan
Journal of Science Policy & Governance
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal: NOAA Policy Priorities for Efficacy and Risk Reduction

Jennifer A. Jordan
article en

Abstract

As the urgency to address the escalating climate crisis grows, innovative solutions for atmospheric carbon removal are being fast-tracked by the federal government, including marine carbon dioxide storage, referred to as marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR). The escalation of federal funding for, and development of, mCDR technologies far outpaces our understanding of the environmental risks and impacts these approaches may have on the ocean and climate. To ensure responsible mCDR development and minimize unintended repercussions, we propose that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) give top consideration to the following areas when shaping mCDR priorities: 1) deep-sea research; 2) mCDR environmental risk analysis and impact; and 3) quality-assured measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification methods. In particular, avoiding environmental risk to the deep ocean should be prioritized. These actions will ensure that NOAA meets its stated objectives of evaluating all mCDR pathways for safety and efficacy and supporting foundational research on the ocean’s baseline functioning.

Journal of Science Policy & GovernanceVol. 26(1)
George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.