Applications of Machine Learning for at‐Risk Student Prediction in Online Education: A 10‐Year Systematic Review of Literature

ABSTRACT Background The growth of online education has provided flexibility and access to a wide range of courses. However, the self‐paced and often isolated nature of these courses has been associated with increased dropout and failure rates. Researchers employed machine learning approaches to identify at‐risk students, but multiple issues have not been addressed concerning the definition of at‐risk students, as well as the strengths and limitations of different machine learning models to predict at‐risk students. Objectives This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the past 10‐year research focusing on applying machine learning techniques for predicting at‐risk students (i.e., failure, dropouts) in online learning environments. Methods Studies were extracted from the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Web of Science, ERIC, ProQuest, and EBSCO. A total of 161 studies published from 2014 to 2024 were included in the review. Results and Conclusions Findings revealed (1) four primary at‐risk definitions outlined in the reviewed studies, each focusing on specific stages of student engagement and performance in a course; (2) most studies relied on student behavioural engagement and academic factors as at‐risk predictors; (3) the adoption of deep learning and ensemble deep learning networks has significantly increased in the past 5 years, often outperforming classical machine learning models. While studies in which classical machine learning excelled often relied on the ensemble methodology and smaller sample sizes; (4) current machine learning practice evaluated by a list of criteria showed concerns regarding reproducibility, generalisability, and interpretability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70058
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applications of Machine Learning for at‐Risk Student Prediction in Online Education: A 10‐Year Systematic Review of Literature

Nuodi Zhang, Hunhui Na, Secil Caskurlu, Hui Shi
3 citations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Online Learning and Analytics
5.08
article

Applications of Machine Learning for at‐Risk Student Prediction in Online Education: A 10‐Year Systematic Review of Literature

Nuodi Zhang, Hunhui Na, Secil Caskurlu, Hui Shi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The growth of online education has provided flexibility and access to a wide range of courses. However, the self‐paced and often isolated nature of these courses has been associated with increased dropout and failure rates. Researchers employed machine learning approaches to identify at‐risk students, but multiple issues have not been addressed concerning the definition of at‐risk students, as well as the strengths and limitations of different machine learning models to predict at‐risk students. Objectives This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the past 10‐year research focusing on applying machine learning techniques for predicting at‐risk students (i.e., failure, dropouts) in online learning environments. Methods Studies were extracted from the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Web of Science, ERIC, ProQuest, and EBSCO. A total of 161 studies published from 2014 to 2024 were included in the review. Results and Conclusions Findings revealed (1) four primary at‐risk definitions outlined in the reviewed studies, each focusing on specific stages of student engagement and performance in a course; (2) most studies relied on student behavioural engagement and academic factors as at‐risk predictors; (3) the adoption of deep learning and ensemble deep learning networks has significantly increased in the past 5 years, often outperforming classical machine learning models. While studies in which classical machine learning excelled often relied on the ensemble methodology and smaller sample sizes; (4) current machine learning practice evaluated by a list of criteria showed concerns regarding reproducibility, generalisability, and interpretability.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 41(4)
Florida State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online Learning and Analytics
5.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.