Architectural practice and the circular built environment transition: empirical insights from Australia

Circular Economy (CE) adoption is considered a crucial decarbonisation pathway for the built environment, offering the potential to reduce emissions, waste, and material consumption. However, CE implementation remains challenging, lagging the timelines required to meet the 2050 climate neutrality goals. To deepen the understanding of these challenges, the study focuses on architects as influential mediators in building projects and their potential role as key enablers in the CE transition. The study draws insights from Australia, where per capita emissions are among the highest globally, but empirical investigations remain limited. Probing the sustainability aspirations of the architectural profession against the reality of practice, the study adopts a phenomenological approach to explore the architects’ perspectives on the CE transition. Employing in-depth semi-structured interviews with architectural professionals (n=12) and thematic analysis, the study reveals current perceptions and practices of CE and identifies key barriers and enablers to its adoption. The study identified policy gaps, knowledge and data gaps, organisational constraints, market immaturity, and cultural inertia as barriers. Conversely, collaborative project delivery, capacity building, strategic use of legal and procedural tools, and demonstration of CE value through standards and exemplars emerged as enablers. The findings provide nuanced, actionable insights to inform CE policy and architectural practice, advancing CE adoption in the Australian built environment. The study highlights that the CE transition entails a broader social transformation within the architectural profession and strong government and industry leadership to ensure a just and empowered transition. Lastly, the empirical findings contribute to circular architecture and building decarbonisation scholarship, offering comparative insights for other geographies and building sectors towards a low-carbon future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building Research & Information
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2026.2751599
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architectural practice and the circular built environment transition: empirical insights from Australia

Sandra Karina Löschke, Alysson Nicole Tamayao Lucas
Building Research & Information
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Architectural practice and the circular built environment transition: empirical insights from Australia

Sandra Karina Löschke, Alysson Nicole Tamayao Lucas
article en

Abstract

Circular Economy (CE) adoption is considered a crucial decarbonisation pathway for the built environment, offering the potential to reduce emissions, waste, and material consumption. However, CE implementation remains challenging, lagging the timelines required to meet the 2050 climate neutrality goals. To deepen the understanding of these challenges, the study focuses on architects as influential mediators in building projects and their potential role as key enablers in the CE transition. The study draws insights from Australia, where per capita emissions are among the highest globally, but empirical investigations remain limited. Probing the sustainability aspirations of the architectural profession against the reality of practice, the study adopts a phenomenological approach to explore the architects’ perspectives on the CE transition. Employing in-depth semi-structured interviews with architectural professionals (n=12) and thematic analysis, the study reveals current perceptions and practices of CE and identifies key barriers and enablers to its adoption. The study identified policy gaps, knowledge and data gaps, organisational constraints, market immaturity, and cultural inertia as barriers. Conversely, collaborative project delivery, capacity building, strategic use of legal and procedural tools, and demonstration of CE value through standards and exemplars emerged as enablers. The findings provide nuanced, actionable insights to inform CE policy and architectural practice, advancing CE adoption in the Australian built environment. The study highlights that the CE transition entails a broader social transformation within the architectural profession and strong government and industry leadership to ensure a just and empowered transition. Lastly, the empirical findings contribute to circular architecture and building decarbonisation scholarship, offering comparative insights for other geographies and building sectors towards a low-carbon future.

Building Research & Information
The University of Sydney (AU)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon