RoSiLC-RS:A Robust Similar Legal Case Recommender System Empowered by Large Language Model and Step-Back Prompting

Legal case recommendation systems face significant challenges in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs). While LLMs offer unprecedented opportunities for understanding legal texts, they also introduce risks through AI-generated false legal content. Our survey reveals concerning gaps in public awareness: 41% of respondents incorrectly believe AI never generates false legal information, while only 6% understand potential legal liabilities. To address these issues, we propose RoSiLC-RS, a Robust Similar Legal Case Recommender System that guides LLMs to understand legal concepts at a higher abstraction level. Our system employs four key components: (1) abstraction processing to extract core legal elements, (2) semantic matching to identify similar case features, (3) LLM-powered explanation generation to provide detailed recommendation rationales, enhancing system explainability, and (4) a specialized detection module to identify and filter AI-generated false content. Comprehensive experiments on real-world legal datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms traditional retrieval approaches in precision, relevance, explainability, and resistance to AI-generated content interference. This research provides both technological solutions and insights for the safe application of LLMs in legal domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocomputing
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130660
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RoSiLC-RS:A Robust Similar Legal Case Recommender System Empowered by Large Language Model and Step-Back Prompting

Guohang Zeng, George Yijun Tian, Guangquan Zhang, Jie Lü
3 citations
Neurocomputing
Artificial Intelligence in Law
25.57
article

RoSiLC-RS:A Robust Similar Legal Case Recommender System Empowered by Large Language Model and Step-Back Prompting

Guohang Zeng, George Yijun Tian, Guangquan Zhang, Jie Lü
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Legal case recommendation systems face significant challenges in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs). While LLMs offer unprecedented opportunities for understanding legal texts, they also introduce risks through AI-generated false legal content. Our survey reveals concerning gaps in public awareness: 41% of respondents incorrectly believe AI never generates false legal information, while only 6% understand potential legal liabilities. To address these issues, we propose RoSiLC-RS, a Robust Similar Legal Case Recommender System that guides LLMs to understand legal concepts at a higher abstraction level. Our system employs four key components: (1) abstraction processing to extract core legal elements, (2) semantic matching to identify similar case features, (3) LLM-powered explanation generation to provide detailed recommendation rationales, enhancing system explainability, and (4) a specialized detection module to identify and filter AI-generated false content. Comprehensive experiments on real-world legal datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms traditional retrieval approaches in precision, relevance, explainability, and resistance to AI-generated content interference. This research provides both technological solutions and insights for the safe application of LLMs in legal domains.

NeurocomputingVol. 648
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.