A Human-centred Methodology to Assess Collaborative Automation Solutions

Integrating collaborative automation in manufacturing often fails because it neglects workers’ expectations, which leads to insufficient acceptance and negative employee experiences. This paper presents a comprehensive human-centred methodology for evaluating collaborative automation systems by examining four key dimensions: task, automation, people and organisational characteristics. The approach combines qualitative assessments with quantitative indicators. Two industrial application cases applying collaborative robotics illustrate the application of the method and highlight its usefulness in identifying areas for improvement. The methodology has proven to be a practical assessment that helps practitioners quickly identify key areas of focus without initially requiring extensive quantitative analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.185
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Human-centred Methodology to Assess Collaborative Automation Solutions

Emanuele Carpanzano, Andrea Bettoni, A. Bruzzone, Fabrizio Bracco et al.
Procedia CIRP
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

A Human-centred Methodology to Assess Collaborative Automation Solutions

Emanuele Carpanzano, Andrea Bettoni, A. Bruzzone, Fabrizio Bracco, Elias Montini, Martina Ivaldi
article en

Abstract

Integrating collaborative automation in manufacturing often fails because it neglects workers’ expectations, which leads to insufficient acceptance and negative employee experiences. This paper presents a comprehensive human-centred methodology for evaluating collaborative automation systems by examining four key dimensions: task, automation, people and organisational characteristics. The approach combines qualitative assessments with quantitative indicators. Two industrial application cases applying collaborative robotics illustrate the application of the method and highlight its usefulness in identifying areas for improvement. The methodology has proven to be a practical assessment that helps practitioners quickly identify key areas of focus without initially requiring extensive quantitative analyses.

Procedia CIRPVol. 134
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), University of Genoa (IT)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Human-centred Methodology to Assess Collaborative Automation Solutions — Emanuele Carpanzano, Andrea Bettoni, et al. · Procedia CIRP (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS