Ethics in manufacturing: a decision-making perspective

The integration of ethical considerations in manufacturing systems has become increasingly an issue of concern for industries over the last decade. This paper proposes a comprehensive systematic framework for ethical decision-making in manufacturing systems, addressing the gap between theory and practical implementation. Following an extensive literature review and analysis by the CIRP Collaborative Working Group on Ethics in Manufacturing, a survey was conducted of CIRP members in February 2024. The study revealed that while practitioners demonstrate awareness of ethical considerations, there remains a significant disconnect between recognition and systematic implementation. The research identifies fragmented approaches across different areas such as environmental responsibilities, labour practices, and AI and automation; this highlights the need for a holistic and systematic framework for ethics in manufacturing. In response, this study proposes a dynamic ethical decision-making framework that develops along three main phases: problem definition, problem resolution, and evaluation. The framework is designed to provide consistent ethical support across all manufacturing areas while addressing cultural disparities that often lead to differences in ethical considerations across regions. While preliminary validation against existing literature shows promising results, ongoing case studies are being conducted to further verify the framework’s applicability across various manufacturing sectors. This research contributes to the field by offering a systematic approach that is both comprehensive and adaptable to evolving manufacturing challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.255
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Management Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics in manufacturing: a decision-making perspective

John W. Sutherland, Rajkumar Roy, Eric Lutters, Neha Shakelly et al.
1 citations
Procedia CIRP
Quality and Management Systems
2.23
article

Ethics in manufacturing: a decision-making perspective

John W. Sutherland, Rajkumar Roy, Eric Lutters, Neha Shakelly, Masayuki Nakao, Greta Bozzelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of ethical considerations in manufacturing systems has become increasingly an issue of concern for industries over the last decade. This paper proposes a comprehensive systematic framework for ethical decision-making in manufacturing systems, addressing the gap between theory and practical implementation. Following an extensive literature review and analysis by the CIRP Collaborative Working Group on Ethics in Manufacturing, a survey was conducted of CIRP members in February 2024. The study revealed that while practitioners demonstrate awareness of ethical considerations, there remains a significant disconnect between recognition and systematic implementation. The research identifies fragmented approaches across different areas such as environmental responsibilities, labour practices, and AI and automation; this highlights the need for a holistic and systematic framework for ethics in manufacturing. In response, this study proposes a dynamic ethical decision-making framework that develops along three main phases: problem definition, problem resolution, and evaluation. The framework is designed to provide consistent ethical support across all manufacturing areas while addressing cultural disparities that often lead to differences in ethical considerations across regions. While preliminary validation against existing literature shows promising results, ongoing case studies are being conducted to further verify the framework’s applicability across various manufacturing sectors. This research contributes to the field by offering a systematic approach that is both comprehensive and adaptable to evolving manufacturing challenges.

Procedia CIRPVol. 134
St George's, University of London (GB), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Stellenbosch University (ZA), The University of Tokyo (JP), University of Twente (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Quality and Management Systems
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.