Predicting physical activity from self-reported mobility in individuals with transtibial amputation: A validation study

Accelerometry-based physical activity monitoring can complement information obtained via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by permitting objective, free-living measurements of mobility. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the Prosthetic Limb User's Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) PROM and accelerometer-measured steps and to develop and validate an equation for predicting steps. Participants with transtibial amputation completed the PLUS-M and wore an activPAL for seven days. LASSO regression was used to build a prediction model in training data (<i>n</i> = 80), and performance was evaluated in holdout data (<i>n</i> = 26). There was a moderately high correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.77) between model-predicted and actual steps in the holdout data. However, the model overestimated steps (<i>t</i><sub>25</sub>=-2.09, <i>p</i> = 0.046) and failed to meet the predefined equivalence threshold of ± 10% of the actual mean step counts (CI: 0, 968.82 steps; <i>p</i> > 0.05). Additionally, a root mean square error of 1,380 steps was noted between the model and activPAL-measured steps, representing roughly 33% of the mean actual step count. While the moderately high correlation highlights the potential of combining PROMs with accelerometer data to approximate physical activity, these limitations indicate the model is not yet suitable for clinical decision-making. Further refinement is required to improve accuracy and enhance practical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2520109
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting physical activity from self-reported mobility in individuals with transtibial amputation: A validation study

Sara E. Burke, Kyle R. Leister, Tiago V. Barreira, Kevin Carroll
1 links
Journal of Sports Sciences
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Predicting physical activity from self-reported mobility in individuals with transtibial amputation: A validation study

Sara E. Burke, Kyle R. Leister, Tiago V. Barreira, Kevin Carroll
article en

Abstract

Accelerometry-based physical activity monitoring can complement information obtained via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by permitting objective, free-living measurements of mobility. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the Prosthetic Limb User's Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) PROM and accelerometer-measured steps and to develop and validate an equation for predicting steps. Participants with transtibial amputation completed the PLUS-M and wore an activPAL for seven days. LASSO regression was used to build a prediction model in training data (<i>n</i> = 80), and performance was evaluated in holdout data (<i>n</i> = 26). There was a moderately high correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.77) between model-predicted and actual steps in the holdout data. However, the model overestimated steps (<i>t</i><sub>25</sub>=-2.09, <i>p</i> = 0.046) and failed to meet the predefined equivalence threshold of ± 10% of the actual mean step counts (CI: 0, 968.82 steps; <i>p</i> > 0.05). Additionally, a root mean square error of 1,380 steps was noted between the model and activPAL-measured steps, representing roughly 33% of the mean actual step count. While the moderately high correlation highlights the potential of combining PROMs with accelerometer data to approximate physical activity, these limitations indicate the model is not yet suitable for clinical decision-making. Further refinement is required to improve accuracy and enhance practical application.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(17)
East Tennessee State University (US), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.