Innovation and entrepreneurship as institutional pathways to prestige

Abstract This article examines how the mandatory subjects of innovation and entrepreneurship are taught in Chinese universities and how they are taken up by learners. Innovation and entrepreneurship education are part of the policy to promote ‘Quality Education’ through more experiential learning aimed to foster independent, creative and well-rounded citizens. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in 2018 and 2019, I argue that innovation and entrepreneurship courses often reproduce the same educational practices they are intended to change. This is the case because the criteria for determining which universities and teachers successfully foster innovation and entrepreneurship do not prioritise pedagogical practice. Instead, by organising numerous courses or winning prizes in entrepreneurship competitions, it is possible to mobilise institutional resources and become empowered within the system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Teaching
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2025.180102
Primary Topic
Economic Issues in Ukraine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation and entrepreneurship as institutional pathways to prestige

Naja Morell Hjortshøj
Learning and Teaching
Economic Issues in Ukraine
article

Innovation and entrepreneurship as institutional pathways to prestige

Naja Morell Hjortshøj
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the mandatory subjects of innovation and entrepreneurship are taught in Chinese universities and how they are taken up by learners. Innovation and entrepreneurship education are part of the policy to promote ‘Quality Education’ through more experiential learning aimed to foster independent, creative and well-rounded citizens. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in 2018 and 2019, I argue that innovation and entrepreneurship courses often reproduce the same educational practices they are intended to change. This is the case because the criteria for determining which universities and teachers successfully foster innovation and entrepreneurship do not prioritise pedagogical practice. Instead, by organising numerous courses or winning prizes in entrepreneurship competitions, it is possible to mobilise institutional resources and become empowered within the system.

Learning and TeachingVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Economic Issues in Ukraine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.