Validation of a laser device for assessing high-speed running in an outdoor team sport setting

Abstract Laser-based systems are commonly used to measure running speed in many sports. The resulting output can be used to assess performance, profile athletes and measure the effect of coaching interventions. This study aimed to compare the running speed output from a commercially available laser (Laser Speed, MuscleLAB) with a three-dimensional motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics Group), a commonly recognized “gold standard” method of measuring human movement. Conducted on a professional football stadium pitch during daylight, 29 participants completed between one and six straight line, high-speed runs (> 6.9 m·s −1 ) over a distance of about 20 m. Instantaneous velocity was obtained from each system and compared across a total of 25,082 samples. Results showed high agreement between the two systems, with a mean root mean square error of 0.06 m·s −1 recorded and an association between the systems of r = 0.99. When considered across the 29 participants, minor differences were noted, with a mean error of 0.03 m·s −1 . Higher error tended to be observed as running speed increased, with low variation in results across different participants. Laser-based speed assessment technology presents as an easy to use, relatively low-cost option for the assessment of linear running speed in outdoor team sport settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Engineering
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-025-00509-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a laser device for assessing high-speed running in an outdoor team sport setting

Robert J. Aughey, Johsan Billingham, Grant M. Duthie, Sam Robertson et al.
3 citations
Sports Engineering
Sports Performance and Training
5.16
article

Validation of a laser device for assessing high-speed running in an outdoor team sport setting

Robert J. Aughey, Johsan Billingham, Grant M. Duthie, Sam Robertson, Kevin Ball, Jade Haycraft, Tom Parkinson, Larry E. Bright
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Laser-based systems are commonly used to measure running speed in many sports. The resulting output can be used to assess performance, profile athletes and measure the effect of coaching interventions. This study aimed to compare the running speed output from a commercially available laser (Laser Speed, MuscleLAB) with a three-dimensional motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics Group), a commonly recognized “gold standard” method of measuring human movement. Conducted on a professional football stadium pitch during daylight, 29 participants completed between one and six straight line, high-speed runs (> 6.9 m·s −1 ) over a distance of about 20 m. Instantaneous velocity was obtained from each system and compared across a total of 25,082 samples. Results showed high agreement between the two systems, with a mean root mean square error of 0.06 m·s −1 recorded and an association between the systems of r = 0.99. When considered across the 29 participants, minor differences were noted, with a mean error of 0.03 m·s −1 . Higher error tended to be observed as running speed increased, with low variation in results across different participants. Laser-based speed assessment technology presents as an easy to use, relatively low-cost option for the assessment of linear running speed in outdoor team sport settings.

Sports EngineeringVol. 28(2)
Fédération Internationale de Football Association (CH), Victoria University (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sports Performance and Training
5.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.