Interplay between lateral extension and subsidence in large pull-apart basins resolved by 3D numerical modeling of the Dead Sea Basin

The evolution of large and deep interplate pull-apart basins is commonly associated with crustal extension, which promotes subsidence, sediment accumulation, Moho uplift, and elevated heat flux. However, the Dead Sea Basin departs from this tectonic model with a relatively cold and thick crust and earthquake activity down to the Moho at ~30 km depth. The Dead Sea basin is subdivided into two sub-basins, with its deepest part at the south. Supported by previous geological, geophysical, and seismological observations, we suggest that the modern tectonic geometry of the basin evolved in two general phases. The evolutionary phases are manifested in differences in the seismicity patterns, where in the north, the longitudinal faults merge at a depth (below 17 km). In contrast, in the south, the faults remain separated. To examine the contribution of the lateral extension to the basin subsidence, we apply 3-D numerical modeling, resulting in an insufficient subsidence rate (0.3 mm/year) to explain the thickness of the sediments (~8 km). We test whether the lateral extension plus a hypothetical magmatic intrusion explains the observed anomalies in the basin structure. Our calculation suggests that the basin evolved by a combination of two phases in which the subsidence rates accelerated from 0.3 mm/year to 0.7 mm/year at ~5 Ma. The northern part of the basin is formed by extensional tectonics, whereas a deep magmatic intrusion could have facilitated the subsidence in the southern part of the basin. We find that the relatively low lateral slip rates in the basin enabled the cooling of the intruded crust and increased its density, which in turn intensified the subsidence rate. This scenario highlights the interplay between lateral extension and subsidence in shaping the structural and seismic characteristics of large pull-apart basins and provides a plausible explanation for the unusual depth of the Dead Sea Basin. • Combined lateral extension with subsidence by magmatic root is numerically tested. • Earthquake density shows a clear difference between the northern and the southern basins. • Our model predicts a subsidence rate of 7 mm/year consistent with the previous estimated rates of the past 5 My.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tectonophysics
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2025.230823
Citations
2
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interplay between lateral extension and subsidence in large pull-apart basins resolved by 3D numerical modeling of the Dead Sea Basin

Amir Sagy, Nadav Wetzler, Vladimir Lyakhovsky, Shmuel Marco et al.
2 citations
Tectonophysics
earthquake and tectonic studies
3.73
article

Interplay between lateral extension and subsidence in large pull-apart basins resolved by 3D numerical modeling of the Dead Sea Basin

Amir Sagy, Nadav Wetzler, Vladimir Lyakhovsky, Shmuel Marco, Shaked Engelberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The evolution of large and deep interplate pull-apart basins is commonly associated with crustal extension, which promotes subsidence, sediment accumulation, Moho uplift, and elevated heat flux. However, the Dead Sea Basin departs from this tectonic model with a relatively cold and thick crust and earthquake activity down to the Moho at ~30 km depth. The Dead Sea basin is subdivided into two sub-basins, with its deepest part at the south. Supported by previous geological, geophysical, and seismological observations, we suggest that the modern tectonic geometry of the basin evolved in two general phases. The evolutionary phases are manifested in differences in the seismicity patterns, where in the north, the longitudinal faults merge at a depth (below 17 km). In contrast, in the south, the faults remain separated. To examine the contribution of the lateral extension to the basin subsidence, we apply 3-D numerical modeling, resulting in an insufficient subsidence rate (0.3 mm/year) to explain the thickness of the sediments (~8 km). We test whether the lateral extension plus a hypothetical magmatic intrusion explains the observed anomalies in the basin structure. Our calculation suggests that the basin evolved by a combination of two phases in which the subsidence rates accelerated from 0.3 mm/year to 0.7 mm/year at ~5 Ma. The northern part of the basin is formed by extensional tectonics, whereas a deep magmatic intrusion could have facilitated the subsidence in the southern part of the basin. We find that the relatively low lateral slip rates in the basin enabled the cooling of the intruded crust and increased its density, which in turn intensified the subsidence rate. This scenario highlights the interplay between lateral extension and subsidence in shaping the structural and seismic characteristics of large pull-apart basins and provides a plausible explanation for the unusual depth of the Dead Sea Basin. • Combined lateral extension with subsidence by magmatic root is numerically tested. • Earthquake density shows a clear difference between the northern and the southern basins. • Our model predicts a subsidence rate of 7 mm/year consistent with the previous estimated rates of the past 5 My.

TectonophysicsVol. 910
Tel Aviv University (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Geological Survey of Israel (IL)
Israel Science Foundation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
earthquake and tectonic studies
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.