Comparative analysis of flavoromic and metabolomic profiling differences between red, firm and non-exudative (RFN) and pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork

This research aimed to identify different flavors and metabolites between red, firm and non-exudative (RFN) and pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork. In this study, the meat quality of RFN and PSE meat was examined, which showed that drip loss, shear force and meat color ( L* value) of PSE meat were markedly higher than those for RFN meat. A total of 1545 flavor compounds were identified in RFN meat and PSE meat, of which 126 had differential abundance between the two types of meat. Furthermore, 19 aroma compounds had ROAV values greater than 1. Metabolomic analysis identified 32 metabolites that had different abundances between RFN and PSE meat. KEGG enrichment analysis of these differential metabolites yielded marked enrichments in 30 signaling pathways including purine metabolism and FoxO signaling pathway. The results of this research identify new perspective into biomarkers flavor compounds and metabolites that differ between RFN and PSE pork. • We conducted flavoromic and metabolomic of RFN and PSE meat. • The 126 differential flavor compounds and 31 differential metabolites were screened. • ROAV values for 19 flavor compounds were greater than 1. • Differential metabolites were enriched in 30 pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LWT
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118040
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of flavoromic and metabolomic profiling differences between red, firm and non-exudative (RFN) and pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork

Xiaofan Tan, Bojiang Li, Yifei Weng, Hongli Che et al.
LWT
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Comparative analysis of flavoromic and metabolomic profiling differences between red, firm and non-exudative (RFN) and pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork

Xiaofan Tan, Bojiang Li, Yifei Weng, Hongli Che, Ruixue Zhao, David M. Irwin, Shuyi Zhang, Jing Chen
article en

Abstract

This research aimed to identify different flavors and metabolites between red, firm and non-exudative (RFN) and pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork. In this study, the meat quality of RFN and PSE meat was examined, which showed that drip loss, shear force and meat color ( L* value) of PSE meat were markedly higher than those for RFN meat. A total of 1545 flavor compounds were identified in RFN meat and PSE meat, of which 126 had differential abundance between the two types of meat. Furthermore, 19 aroma compounds had ROAV values greater than 1. Metabolomic analysis identified 32 metabolites that had different abundances between RFN and PSE meat. KEGG enrichment analysis of these differential metabolites yielded marked enrichments in 30 signaling pathways including purine metabolism and FoxO signaling pathway. The results of this research identify new perspective into biomarkers flavor compounds and metabolites that differ between RFN and PSE pork. • We conducted flavoromic and metabolomic of RFN and PSE meat. • The 126 differential flavor compounds and 31 differential metabolites were screened. • ROAV values for 19 flavor compounds were greater than 1. • Differential metabolites were enriched in 30 pathways.

LWTVol. 228
Shenyang Agricultural University (CN), University of Toronto (CA)
Department of Education of Liaoning Province, Shenyang Science and Technology Bureau
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.