Election worry, political identity, and subsequent physical health in the United States

Political polarization surrounding elections may have population-level physical health consequences over time. Given that psychological distress is associated with worse physical health, heightened election-related worry (a.k.a. election worry) may have negative physical health implications for the U.S. population. We assessed the prospective association between worry about the 2020 presidential election and new onset physical health ailments over the subsequent 3 years in a nationally representative U.S. sample ( N = 4,311) and examined differences by political identity. Our longitudinal cohort study used the probability-based NORC AmeriSpeak Panel. Baseline physician-diagnosed mental and physical health conditions, smoking, political identity, and demographics were assessed pre-2020, with new-onset physical health ailments (e.g., heart problems, cancer, stroke) reassessed in Spring 2022 and Summer 2023. Election worry was measured in September-October 2020; political identity and demographics were updated Fall 2021. Adjusting for demographics, baseline health conditions, smoking, health insurance coverage, and prior mental health diagnosis, each one-unit increase in 2020 election worry was associated with 12% higher odds of developing any new-onset physical health ailments (OR = 1.12, 95% CI[1.01, 1.24], p = .026) over the subsequent 3 years. This association was significantly stronger for Republicans compared to Democrats (OR = 1.28, 95% CI[1.01, 1.62], p = .038). These findings suggest that election worry may be a social determinant of health with measurable physical health consequences, particularly among those whose political party loses the election. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing interventions to mitigate the health impacts of political stress in an increasingly polarized society. • Longitudinal probability-based nationally representative study in U.S. 2020-2023 • 2020 election worry predicts higher odds of new physical health ailments 3 yrs later • This association was stronger for Republicans than Democrats • Democrats report more 2024 election worry than Republicans and Independents • Growing worry over U.S. elections may undermine subsequent physical health

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Mental Health
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100476
Primary Topic
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Election worry, political identity, and subsequent physical health in the United States

Daniel P. Relihan, Ellen Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver, Dana Rose Garfin et al.
SSM - Mental Health
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
article

Election worry, political identity, and subsequent physical health in the United States

Daniel P. Relihan, Ellen Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver, Dana Rose Garfin, Branislav Jovanović, Kayley D. Estes
article en

Abstract

Political polarization surrounding elections may have population-level physical health consequences over time. Given that psychological distress is associated with worse physical health, heightened election-related worry (a.k.a. election worry) may have negative physical health implications for the U.S. population. We assessed the prospective association between worry about the 2020 presidential election and new onset physical health ailments over the subsequent 3 years in a nationally representative U.S. sample ( N = 4,311) and examined differences by political identity. Our longitudinal cohort study used the probability-based NORC AmeriSpeak Panel. Baseline physician-diagnosed mental and physical health conditions, smoking, political identity, and demographics were assessed pre-2020, with new-onset physical health ailments (e.g., heart problems, cancer, stroke) reassessed in Spring 2022 and Summer 2023. Election worry was measured in September-October 2020; political identity and demographics were updated Fall 2021. Adjusting for demographics, baseline health conditions, smoking, health insurance coverage, and prior mental health diagnosis, each one-unit increase in 2020 election worry was associated with 12% higher odds of developing any new-onset physical health ailments (OR = 1.12, 95% CI[1.01, 1.24], p = .026) over the subsequent 3 years. This association was significantly stronger for Republicans compared to Democrats (OR = 1.28, 95% CI[1.01, 1.62], p = .038). These findings suggest that election worry may be a social determinant of health with measurable physical health consequences, particularly among those whose political party loses the election. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing interventions to mitigate the health impacts of political stress in an increasingly polarized society. • Longitudinal probability-based nationally representative study in U.S. 2020-2023 • 2020 election worry predicts higher odds of new physical health ailments 3 yrs later • This association was stronger for Republicans than Democrats • Democrats report more 2024 election worry than Republicans and Independents • Growing worry over U.S. elections may undermine subsequent physical health

SSM - Mental HealthVol. 8
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Fielding Graduate University (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.