Degrees of freedom effects on a laboratory scale WEC point absorber

There are many archetypes of wave energy converters (WEC) that vary widely in operating principles, geometry, controls, number of bodies, and degrees of freedom (DOF). Fundamental WEC research often simplifies this complexity by reducing the number of floating bodies and restricting motions to the dominant degree of freedom. This paper presents the effects of increasing the number of bodies and degrees of freedom of a WEC on body response, power take-off controls, and power capture. The results are from physical experiments with a 1 meter diameter model of the open-source laboratory upgrade point absorber (LUPA). LUPA is a two-body point absorber WEC with a buoyancy-driven float and a reactionary spar with a large heave plate. It can be transformed between a one-body heave-only, two-body heave-only, and a two-body 6 DOF device without changing the geometries, controls, or mooring lines. Results show that adding a secondary submerged body to a point absorber causes power capture to decrease by up to 76% at longer periods. It is also demonstrated that constraining a two-body point absorber to heave motions can be a good power capture approximation for a six-DOF moored two-body point absorber with slight shifts in the resonant period. A discussion on the uncertainty of frequently used metrics in wave energy literature is included with a special focus on uncertainty in wave energy experimental testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Marine Energy Journal
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36688/imej.8.29-35
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Degrees of freedom effects on a laboratory scale WEC point absorber

Bryson R.D. Robertson, Courtney Beringer, Bret Bosma
2 citations
International Marine Energy Journal
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
2.65
article

Degrees of freedom effects on a laboratory scale WEC point absorber

Bryson R.D. Robertson, Courtney Beringer, Bret Bosma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There are many archetypes of wave energy converters (WEC) that vary widely in operating principles, geometry, controls, number of bodies, and degrees of freedom (DOF). Fundamental WEC research often simplifies this complexity by reducing the number of floating bodies and restricting motions to the dominant degree of freedom. This paper presents the effects of increasing the number of bodies and degrees of freedom of a WEC on body response, power take-off controls, and power capture. The results are from physical experiments with a 1 meter diameter model of the open-source laboratory upgrade point absorber (LUPA). LUPA is a two-body point absorber WEC with a buoyancy-driven float and a reactionary spar with a large heave plate. It can be transformed between a one-body heave-only, two-body heave-only, and a two-body 6 DOF device without changing the geometries, controls, or mooring lines. Results show that adding a secondary submerged body to a point absorber causes power capture to decrease by up to 76% at longer periods. It is also demonstrated that constraining a two-body point absorber to heave motions can be a good power capture approximation for a six-DOF moored two-body point absorber with slight shifts in the resonant period. A discussion on the uncertainty of frequently used metrics in wave energy literature is included with a special focus on uncertainty in wave energy experimental testing.

International Marine Energy JournalVol. 8(1)
Oregon State University (US), Pacific Environment (US), Osun State University (NG)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
2.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.