CONSUMPTION AND USE OF FEED RATION NUTRIENTS BY PURE-BRED AND CROSSBRED FIRST-CALF COWS

The aim of the study is to establish the influence of the genotype of first-calf heifers of the Black-and-White breed, Holsteins of German and Dutch selection and their first-generation crosses ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of German selection and ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of Dutch selection on the consumption and use of nutrients in the feed ration. The studies are conducted in 2019–2020 on animals, adherents of Akas AF LLP, the West Kazakhstan Region. The object of the study is lactating purebred first-calf heifers of the Black-and-White (Group I), Holstein breeds of German (Group II) and Dutch (Group III) selection and their first-generation crosses ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of German selection (Group IV), ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of Dutch selection (Group V). The leading position in the consumption of all types of nutrients was established for first-calf heifers of the Holstein breed of Groups II and III, the minimum number was generally accepted purebred animals of Group I, crosses of Groups IV and V occupied an intermediate position. First-calf heifers of groups II–V exceeded their peers of group I in the consumption of all types of nutrients by 12.5–1105 g (2.22–6.68 %). At the same time, crossbreeds of groups IV and V were inferior to purebred first-calf heifers in the consumption of nutrients by 6.9–737 g (1.18–4.36 %). An advantage of first-calf heifers of groups II–V over their peers of group I was noted in the amount of digested nutrients within 11.9–1014.0 g (3.11–7.78 %). In turn, crossbreeds of groups IV and V were inferior to purebred first-calf heifers of groups II and III in the analyzed indicator by 14.0–548.0 g (3.52–4.79 %). When analyzing intergroup differences in the nutrient digestibility coefficient, its minimum value was found in purebred first-calf heifers of group I, which were inferior to their peers of groups II–V by 0.06–3.92 %. At the same time, crossbreeds of groups IV and V were inferior to purebred first-calf heifers of groups II and III in terms of the nutrient digestibility coefficient by 0.85–1.68 %. The leading position in terms of the digestibility coefficient of all types of nutrients was occupied by first-calf heifers of group III, while their peers of group II were inferior to them by 0.76–1.10 %. The manifestation of the crossbreeding effect in both the consumption of nutrients and their use differed in the crossbreeding of groups IV and V.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of KSAU
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2025-4-136-144
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONSUMPTION AND USE OF FEED RATION NUTRIENTS BY PURE-BRED AND CROSSBRED FIRST-CALF COWS

Владимир Косилов, Yu. A. Yuldashbaev, Ильмира Рахимжанова, Bakytkanym Kadralieva
Bulletin of KSAU
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

CONSUMPTION AND USE OF FEED RATION NUTRIENTS BY PURE-BRED AND CROSSBRED FIRST-CALF COWS

Владимир Косилов, Yu. A. Yuldashbaev, Ильмира Рахимжанова, Bakytkanym Kadralieva
article en

Abstract

The aim of the study is to establish the influence of the genotype of first-calf heifers of the Black-and-White breed, Holsteins of German and Dutch selection and their first-generation crosses ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of German selection and ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of Dutch selection on the consumption and use of nutrients in the feed ration. The studies are conducted in 2019–2020 on animals, adherents of Akas AF LLP, the West Kazakhstan Region. The object of the study is lactating purebred first-calf heifers of the Black-and-White (Group I), Holstein breeds of German (Group II) and Dutch (Group III) selection and their first-generation crosses ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of German selection (Group IV), ½ Black-and-White × ½ Holstein of Dutch selection (Group V). The leading position in the consumption of all types of nutrients was established for first-calf heifers of the Holstein breed of Groups II and III, the minimum number was generally accepted purebred animals of Group I, crosses of Groups IV and V occupied an intermediate position. First-calf heifers of groups II–V exceeded their peers of group I in the consumption of all types of nutrients by 12.5–1105 g (2.22–6.68 %). At the same time, crossbreeds of groups IV and V were inferior to purebred first-calf heifers in the consumption of nutrients by 6.9–737 g (1.18–4.36 %). An advantage of first-calf heifers of groups II–V over their peers of group I was noted in the amount of digested nutrients within 11.9–1014.0 g (3.11–7.78 %). In turn, crossbreeds of groups IV and V were inferior to purebred first-calf heifers of groups II and III in the analyzed indicator by 14.0–548.0 g (3.52–4.79 %). When analyzing intergroup differences in the nutrient digestibility coefficient, its minimum value was found in purebred first-calf heifers of group I, which were inferior to their peers of groups II–V by 0.06–3.92 %. At the same time, crossbreeds of groups IV and V were inferior to purebred first-calf heifers of groups II and III in terms of the nutrient digestibility coefficient by 0.85–1.68 %. The leading position in terms of the digestibility coefficient of all types of nutrients was occupied by first-calf heifers of group III, while their peers of group II were inferior to them by 0.76–1.10 %. The manifestation of the crossbreeding effect in both the consumption of nutrients and their use differed in the crossbreeding of groups IV and V.

Bulletin of KSAUVol. 0(4)
Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V.P. Goryachkin (RU), Orenburg State Agrarian University (RU), Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.