The critic D. Yuriev that never was

Yury Dombrovsky’s critical legacy is relatively small — at least, judging by the materials available or known to exist to date. This publication, then, appears all the more important: following almost 90 years of oblivion, it reprints his review of a seminal novel of the 1930s, Yury Tynyanov’s Pushkin . Dombrovsky’s review appeared under the pen name D. Yuriev. It is inexplicably missing from all of the writer’s collected works. While not offering truly eye-opening observations, the review is nonetheless of interest because it features Dombrovsky’s ideas about the Soviet historical novel and gives insights about his views of literature and reading list of the day. It seems that, at the time, Dombrovsky the critic was guided by a set of ideologically charged premises he must have believed to be the epitome of historical philosophy. It is also noteworthy that, along with the review, the same issue of the journal Literaturniy Kazakhstan contained Dombrovsky’s first historical novel Derzhavin . The publication of his novel and review heralded the first serious literary ambitions of the future author of The Keeper of Antiquities [ Khranitel drevnostey ] and The Faculty of Useless Knowledge [ Fakultet nenuzhnykh veshchey ].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy literatury
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2025-3-161-177
Primary Topic
Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The critic D. Yuriev that never was

I. Duardovich
Voprosy literatury
Historical and Modern Theater Studies
article

The critic D. Yuriev that never was

I. Duardovich
article en

Abstract

Yury Dombrovsky’s critical legacy is relatively small — at least, judging by the materials available or known to exist to date. This publication, then, appears all the more important: following almost 90 years of oblivion, it reprints his review of a seminal novel of the 1930s, Yury Tynyanov’s Pushkin . Dombrovsky’s review appeared under the pen name D. Yuriev. It is inexplicably missing from all of the writer’s collected works. While not offering truly eye-opening observations, the review is nonetheless of interest because it features Dombrovsky’s ideas about the Soviet historical novel and gives insights about his views of literature and reading list of the day. It seems that, at the time, Dombrovsky the critic was guided by a set of ideologically charged premises he must have believed to be the epitome of historical philosophy. It is also noteworthy that, along with the review, the same issue of the journal Literaturniy Kazakhstan contained Dombrovsky’s first historical novel Derzhavin . The publication of his novel and review heralded the first serious literary ambitions of the future author of The Keeper of Antiquities [ Khranitel drevnostey ] and The Faculty of Useless Knowledge [ Fakultet nenuzhnykh veshchey ].

Voprosy literatury(3)
Institut Pro Studium Literatury (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Historical and Modern Theater Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The critic D. Yuriev that never was — I. Duardovich · Voprosy literatury (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS