Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering asthma-related questions
Although ChatGPT performed well in providing answers to laypersons, the answers that it provided to specialists were less accurate and superficial. Although AI has the potential to provide useful information to the public, it should not replace medical guidance. Critical analysis of AI-generated information remains essential for health care professionals and laypersons alike, especially for complex conditions such as asthma.
Authors
- Ricardo G. Figueiredo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2128-2775)
- Bruno Pellozo Cerqueira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7112-5511)
- Sônia Maria Faresin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-8015)
- José Antônio Baddini Martínez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8160-5084)
- Carolina da Franca (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7365-2806)
- Lilian Serrasqueiro Ballini Caetano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-6880)
- Fernando Sergio Leitão Filho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0064-7002)
- Andrea Antunes Cetlin
- Vinicius Cappellette da Silva Leite
Institutions
- Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR)
- Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (BR)
- Associação Paulista de Medicina (BR)
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240388
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.96