Energy Community Business Models Archetypes

Energy Communities (ECs) constitute innovative organizational forms that promote energy market democratization by enabling multiple stakeholders to produce, manage, and control energy assets. Despite the emergence of diverse EC business models (BMs), a systematic categorization is lacking. Prior literature offers heterogeneous analyses due to varied analytical frameworks. This paper identifies and categorizes key dimensions from the literature and develops a tailored analytical framework for evaluating EC BMs. Through a systematic review of academic papers and reports, we identified five of the most recurrent and significant dimensions: value proposition, value capture, main functions, governance, and membership. These dimensions form the foundation of our newly developed comprehensive framework. Using this framework, we delineate four archetypal EC business models: self-consumption, third-party, aggregator, and integrated energy services and e-mobility. The proposed framework enhances the analysis of EC BMs and provides practical guidance for researchers and practitioners in designing, assessing, and optimizing these models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cpe-powereng63314.2025.11027308
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Community Business Models Archetypes

Edoardo Croci, S.M. Masum Ahmed, Annamaria Bagaini, Konstantinos Pantazis
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
article

Energy Community Business Models Archetypes

Edoardo Croci, S.M. Masum Ahmed, Annamaria Bagaini, Konstantinos Pantazis
article en

Abstract

Energy Communities (ECs) constitute innovative organizational forms that promote energy market democratization by enabling multiple stakeholders to produce, manage, and control energy assets. Despite the emergence of diverse EC business models (BMs), a systematic categorization is lacking. Prior literature offers heterogeneous analyses due to varied analytical frameworks. This paper identifies and categorizes key dimensions from the literature and develops a tailored analytical framework for evaluating EC BMs. Through a systematic review of academic papers and reports, we identified five of the most recurrent and significant dimensions: value proposition, value capture, main functions, governance, and membership. These dimensions form the foundation of our newly developed comprehensive framework. Using this framework, we delineate four archetypal EC business models: self-consumption, third-party, aggregator, and integrated energy services and e-mobility. The proposed framework enhances the analysis of EC BMs and provides practical guidance for researchers and practitioners in designing, assessing, and optimizing these models.

Bocconi University (IT)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy Community Business Models Archetypes — Edoardo Croci, S.M. Masum Ahmed, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS