Integration of MRI radiomics and germline genetics to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas

The molecular profiling of gliomas for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations currently relies on resected tumor samples, highlighting the need for non-invasive, preoperative biomarkers. We investigated the integration of glioma polygenic risk scores (PRS) and radiographic features for prediction of IDH mutation status. We used 256 radiomic features, a glioma PRS and demographic information in 158 glioma cases within elastic net and neural network models. The integration of glioma PRS with radiomics increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for distinguishing IDH-wildtype vs. IDH-mutant glioma from 0.83 to 0.88 (P<sub>ΔAUC</sub> = 6.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) in the elastic net model and from 0.91 to 0.92 (P<sub>ΔAUC</sub> = 0.32) in the neural network model. Incorporating age at diagnosis and sex further improved the classifiers (elastic net: AUC = 0.93, neural network: AUC = 0.93). Patients predicted to have IDH-mutant vs. IDH-wildtype tumors had significantly lower mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.40, P = 2.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), comparable to prognostic trajectories for biopsy-confirmed IDH status. The augmentation of imaging-based classifiers with genetic risk profiles may help delineate molecular subtypes and improve the timely, non-invasive clinical assessment of glioma patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Precision Oncology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-00980-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of MRI radiomics and germline genetics to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas

Thomas Barba, George Henderson, Rohan Bareja, Stephen Francis et al.
4 citations
npj Precision Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
6.50
article

Integration of MRI radiomics and germline genetics to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas

Thomas Barba, George Henderson, Rohan Bareja, Stephen Francis, Geno Guerra, Taishi Nakase, Linda Kachuri, Olivier Gevaert, Qingyu Zhao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The molecular profiling of gliomas for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations currently relies on resected tumor samples, highlighting the need for non-invasive, preoperative biomarkers. We investigated the integration of glioma polygenic risk scores (PRS) and radiographic features for prediction of IDH mutation status. We used 256 radiomic features, a glioma PRS and demographic information in 158 glioma cases within elastic net and neural network models. The integration of glioma PRS with radiomics increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for distinguishing IDH-wildtype vs. IDH-mutant glioma from 0.83 to 0.88 (P<sub>ΔAUC</sub> = 6.9 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) in the elastic net model and from 0.91 to 0.92 (P<sub>ΔAUC</sub> = 0.32) in the neural network model. Incorporating age at diagnosis and sex further improved the classifiers (elastic net: AUC = 0.93, neural network: AUC = 0.93). Patients predicted to have IDH-mutant vs. IDH-wildtype tumors had significantly lower mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.40, P = 2.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), comparable to prognostic trajectories for biopsy-confirmed IDH status. The augmentation of imaging-based classifiers with genetic risk profiles may help delineate molecular subtypes and improve the timely, non-invasive clinical assessment of glioma patients.

npj Precision OncologyVol. 9(1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Cornell University (US), Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Hôpital Edouard Herriot (FR), Stanford Medicine (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.