Unilateral incentive alignment in two-agent stochastic games

Multiagent learning is challenging when agents face mixed-motivation interactions, where conflicts of interest arise as agents independently try to optimize their respective outcomes. Recent advancements in evolutionary game theory have identified a class of "zero-determinant" strategies, which confer an agent with significant unilateral control over outcomes in repeated games. Building on these insights, we present a comprehensive generalization of zero-determinant strategies to stochastic games, encompassing dynamic environments. We propose an algorithm that allows an agent to discover strategies enforcing predetermined linear (or approximately linear) payoff relationships. Of particular interest is the relationship in which both payoffs are equal, which serves as a proxy for fairness in symmetric games. We demonstrate that an agent can discover strategies enforcing such relationships through experience alone, without coordinating with an opponent. In finding and using such a strategy, an agent ("enforcer") can incentivize optimal and equitable outcomes, circumventing potential exploitation. In particular, from the opponent's viewpoint, the enforcer transforms a mixed-motivation problem into a cooperative problem, paving the way for more collaboration and fairness in multiagent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319927121
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unilateral incentive alignment in two-agent stochastic games

Udari Madhushani, Naomi Ehrich Leonard, Qi Su, Wolfram Barfuß et al.
6 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
25.21
article

Unilateral incentive alignment in two-agent stochastic games

Udari Madhushani, Naomi Ehrich Leonard, Qi Su, Wolfram Barfuß, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Joshua B. Plotkin, Christian Hilbe, Alex McAvoy
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Multiagent learning is challenging when agents face mixed-motivation interactions, where conflicts of interest arise as agents independently try to optimize their respective outcomes. Recent advancements in evolutionary game theory have identified a class of "zero-determinant" strategies, which confer an agent with significant unilateral control over outcomes in repeated games. Building on these insights, we present a comprehensive generalization of zero-determinant strategies to stochastic games, encompassing dynamic environments. We propose an algorithm that allows an agent to discover strategies enforcing predetermined linear (or approximately linear) payoff relationships. Of particular interest is the relationship in which both payoffs are equal, which serves as a proxy for fairness in symmetric games. We demonstrate that an agent can discover strategies enforcing such relationships through experience alone, without coordinating with an opponent. In finding and using such a strategy, an agent ("enforcer") can incentivize optimal and equitable outcomes, circumventing potential exploitation. In particular, from the opponent's viewpoint, the enforcer transforms a mixed-motivation problem into a cooperative problem, paving the way for more collaboration and fairness in multiagent systems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(25)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US), Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), University of Bonn (DE), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Princeton University (US), Morgan Stanley (United States) (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.