Environmental Justice and CCS Infrastructure: Overlaps and Oversights at the National and State Levels

Abstract Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is critical in meeting U.S. decarbonization goals. Recently, tax incentives and federal grants have spurred interest in CCS resulting in dozens of projects in various stages of development across the country. The federal government has created metrics to measure which communities have been historically disadvantaged or overburdened by pollution and has made efforts to not unnecessarily harm these communities as CCS is deployed at scale. Because CCS is comprised of three distinct components that could occur at distant geographic locations, this article describes preliminary models that show where the most economically feasible capture, storage, and transportation locations for industrial emissions are likely to be, and by intersecting these results with federal metrics regarding environmental justice, explores the scale of impacts CCS may have on disadvantaged communities, with particular focus on the applicability of national tract-level data sets on Wyoming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Resilience and Justice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/crcj_a_00016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Justice and CCS Infrastructure: Overlaps and Oversights at the National and State Levels

Marcos Luiz Cavalcanti de Miranda, Erin Middleton, Qasim Mehdi
1 citations
Journal of Climate Resilience and Justice
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
4.20
article

Environmental Justice and CCS Infrastructure: Overlaps and Oversights at the National and State Levels

Marcos Luiz Cavalcanti de Miranda, Erin Middleton, Qasim Mehdi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is critical in meeting U.S. decarbonization goals. Recently, tax incentives and federal grants have spurred interest in CCS resulting in dozens of projects in various stages of development across the country. The federal government has created metrics to measure which communities have been historically disadvantaged or overburdened by pollution and has made efforts to not unnecessarily harm these communities as CCS is deployed at scale. Because CCS is comprised of three distinct components that could occur at distant geographic locations, this article describes preliminary models that show where the most economically feasible capture, storage, and transportation locations for industrial emissions are likely to be, and by intersecting these results with federal metrics regarding environmental justice, explores the scale of impacts CCS may have on disadvantaged communities, with particular focus on the applicability of national tract-level data sets on Wyoming.

Journal of Climate Resilience and JusticeVol. 2
Carbon Solutions (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.