Translation as Repoliticization: Thinking with Gombrich (and Popper) in Post-Mao China

This article examines the reception of Ernst Gombrich and Karl Popper in post-Mao China between 1980 and 1995. By situating these two scholars’ works within the context of the Cold War, I interpret their translation into Chinese after the end of the Cultural Revolution as a reanimation of their Cold War politics, while excavating cosmopolitan convergences across the East-West divide at the height of ideological factionalism. My argument traces this repoliticization through three interconnected spheres: a politics of method that moves away from determinism and integrates art and science; a disciplinary drift from textually oriented aesthetic theory to visually oriented art history; and a translingual negotiation in contemporary art discourse centered around the term “experimentation.” The article presents a version of global art historiography that foregrounds time-bound dialogues charged with political urgencies over the universalization and proselytization of disciplinary ideas, and it offers concluding remarks on its implications for a “global art history.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Humanities
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734369
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation as Repoliticization: Thinking with Gombrich (and Popper) in Post-Mao China

Wenyi Qian
History of Humanities
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Translation as Repoliticization: Thinking with Gombrich (and Popper) in Post-Mao China

Wenyi Qian
article en

Abstract

This article examines the reception of Ernst Gombrich and Karl Popper in post-Mao China between 1980 and 1995. By situating these two scholars’ works within the context of the Cold War, I interpret their translation into Chinese after the end of the Cultural Revolution as a reanimation of their Cold War politics, while excavating cosmopolitan convergences across the East-West divide at the height of ideological factionalism. My argument traces this repoliticization through three interconnected spheres: a politics of method that moves away from determinism and integrates art and science; a disciplinary drift from textually oriented aesthetic theory to visually oriented art history; and a translingual negotiation in contemporary art discourse centered around the term “experimentation.” The article presents a version of global art historiography that foregrounds time-bound dialogues charged with political urgencies over the universalization and proselytization of disciplinary ideas, and it offers concluding remarks on its implications for a “global art history.”

History of HumanitiesVol. 10(1)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Translation as Repoliticization: Thinking with Gombrich (and Popper) in Post-Mao China — Wenyi Qian · History of Humanities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS