Special Issue on CDS Failures: Transitioning an Ineffective Medications On Hold Alert from Interruptive to Non-Interruptive to Decrease Alert Burden

Interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) alerts are intended to improve patient care, but can contribute to alert fatigue, diminishing their effectiveness. The alert demonstrated minimal clinical effect while contributing significantly to alert fatigue.This study aims to evaluate if transitioning a high-firing medication on hold alert from interruptive to noninterruptive would change provider practices.The alert was triggered when at least two medications were held for >48 hours. A pre-post intervention cohort study was conducted to evaluate transitioning the medication on hold alert from interruptive to noninterruptive. A comparison was made to evaluate provider practices in resuming medications during the 6 months before and after transitioning the alert. Data were extracted from the medication administration record and the institutional risk reporting system.After transitioning to a noninterruptive alert, the number of actions taken by clicking on the alert decreased from 33,632 (3.0 clicks per hospital encounter) to 305 (0.02 clicks per hospital encounter) in a 6-month period. There was no significant change in the median hold duration of medications that were on hold for greater than 48 hours (81.5 hours and 85.6 hours in the pre- and postintervention cohorts, respectively [<i>p</i>-value = 0.22]). There was no change in the most frequent medications that were held until patient discharge, and there was no increased reporting of medication-on-hold safety events.The initial interruptive medication on hold alert was not effective and contributed to a high volume of alerts in our institution. Transitioning the medications on hold alert from an interruptive to a noninterruptive alert reduced potential alert fatigue without significantly impacting clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the need for careful evaluation of CDS alerts to balance clinical utility and provider alert burden. Alerts that do not affect the desired clinical outcome should be redesigned or retired.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2632-0605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Special Issue on CDS Failures: Transitioning an Ineffective Medications On Hold Alert from Interruptive to Non-Interruptive to Decrease Alert Burden

James M. Blum, Nathan Meyer, Lindsey A. Knake, A. Bronson et al.
1 citations
Applied Clinical Informatics
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
2.01
article

Special Issue on CDS Failures: Transitioning an Ineffective Medications On Hold Alert from Interruptive to Non-Interruptive to Decrease Alert Burden

James M. Blum, Nathan Meyer, Lindsey A. Knake, A. Bronson, Joshua Kettelkamp, Kenneth Hacker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) alerts are intended to improve patient care, but can contribute to alert fatigue, diminishing their effectiveness. The alert demonstrated minimal clinical effect while contributing significantly to alert fatigue.This study aims to evaluate if transitioning a high-firing medication on hold alert from interruptive to noninterruptive would change provider practices.The alert was triggered when at least two medications were held for >48 hours. A pre-post intervention cohort study was conducted to evaluate transitioning the medication on hold alert from interruptive to noninterruptive. A comparison was made to evaluate provider practices in resuming medications during the 6 months before and after transitioning the alert. Data were extracted from the medication administration record and the institutional risk reporting system.After transitioning to a noninterruptive alert, the number of actions taken by clicking on the alert decreased from 33,632 (3.0 clicks per hospital encounter) to 305 (0.02 clicks per hospital encounter) in a 6-month period. There was no significant change in the median hold duration of medications that were on hold for greater than 48 hours (81.5 hours and 85.6 hours in the pre- and postintervention cohorts, respectively [<i>p</i>-value = 0.22]). There was no change in the most frequent medications that were held until patient discharge, and there was no increased reporting of medication-on-hold safety events.The initial interruptive medication on hold alert was not effective and contributed to a high volume of alerts in our institution. Transitioning the medications on hold alert from an interruptive to a noninterruptive alert reduced potential alert fatigue without significantly impacting clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the need for careful evaluation of CDS alerts to balance clinical utility and provider alert burden. Alerts that do not affect the desired clinical outcome should be redesigned or retired.

Applied Clinical InformaticsVol. 16(4)
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US), University of Iowa Health Care (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.