Public open space, adverse live events and psychological distress in Melbourne, Australia

• Public open space is associated with lower psychological distress. • Public open space-psychological distress link depends on an adverse life event. • Public open space-psychological distress link is greater in more natural areas. This study replicates and builds on earlier work by Høj et al. (2021) conducted in Montreal, Canada, to examine the extent to which residing in close proximity to open public spaces can buffer psychological distress using survey data from Melbourne, Australia. We find that proximity to public open space is negatively associated with psychological distress with stronger effects evident among participants who have experienced an adverse life event or where proximate open space is ‘natural or semi-natural’, compared to maintained (for example sports fields, civic squares). Our results align with those of Høj et al. (2021) and provide support for the stress buffering potential of open spaces. While the findings are modest in terms of absolute effect sizes, they demonstrate that natural public open spaces may provide an effective refuge for people experiencing an adverse life event and highlight the importance of ensuring natural open spaces are a central consideration of residential developments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105443
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public open space, adverse live events and psychological distress in Melbourne, Australia

Christopher L. Ambrey, Renee Zahnow
Landscape and Urban Planning
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Public open space, adverse live events and psychological distress in Melbourne, Australia

Christopher L. Ambrey, Renee Zahnow
article en

Abstract

• Public open space is associated with lower psychological distress. • Public open space-psychological distress link depends on an adverse life event. • Public open space-psychological distress link is greater in more natural areas. This study replicates and builds on earlier work by Høj et al. (2021) conducted in Montreal, Canada, to examine the extent to which residing in close proximity to open public spaces can buffer psychological distress using survey data from Melbourne, Australia. We find that proximity to public open space is negatively associated with psychological distress with stronger effects evident among participants who have experienced an adverse life event or where proximate open space is ‘natural or semi-natural’, compared to maintained (for example sports fields, civic squares). Our results align with those of Høj et al. (2021) and provide support for the stress buffering potential of open spaces. While the findings are modest in terms of absolute effect sizes, they demonstrate that natural public open spaces may provide an effective refuge for people experiencing an adverse life event and highlight the importance of ensuring natural open spaces are a central consideration of residential developments.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 263
Griffith University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.