Politiets brug af ansigtsgenkendelse

Facial recognition technology has the potential to enhance police investigations, but risks significant intrusions into fundamental rights, such as the right to privacy. Drawing on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the AI Act, and the EU Law Enforcement Directive, this article examines the two uses of facial recognition granted to Danish police in 2024: victim recognition in cases of child sexual abuse and facial recognition of suspects in serious violent crimes. At present, the use of facial recognition by Danish police is guided solely by political decisions, resulting in highly ambiguous frameworks regarding the types of cases in which the technology may be used and the databases that may be cross-referenced. The article argues for clear legal authorization in compliance with the Law Enforcement Directive.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v112i2.157707
Primary Topic
Research in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politiets brug af ansigtsgenkendelse

Tanja Kammersgaard Christensen, Lene Wacher Lentz
Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab
Research in Social Sciences
article

Politiets brug af ansigtsgenkendelse

Tanja Kammersgaard Christensen, Lene Wacher Lentz
article en

Abstract

Facial recognition technology has the potential to enhance police investigations, but risks significant intrusions into fundamental rights, such as the right to privacy. Drawing on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the AI Act, and the EU Law Enforcement Directive, this article examines the two uses of facial recognition granted to Danish police in 2024: victim recognition in cases of child sexual abuse and facial recognition of suspects in serious violent crimes. At present, the use of facial recognition by Danish police is guided solely by political decisions, resulting in highly ambiguous frameworks regarding the types of cases in which the technology may be used and the databases that may be cross-referenced. The article argues for clear legal authorization in compliance with the Law Enforcement Directive.

Nordisk Tidsskrift for KriminalvidenskabVol. 112(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Research in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.