Punitive attitudes in Australia: Investigating the rural-urban divide

Research exploring punitive attitudes across different geographic locations is limited. Available research suggests that rural residents may be less tolerant of crime and more likely to hold punitive attitudes when compared to their urban counterparts. However, we have little understanding of this difference. Drawing on survey data from a representative sample of the Australian public (Urban 77.1 %, N = 401 and Rural 22.9 %, N = 119), this study explores differences in punitive attitudes among rural and urban Australians and examines the factors contributing to this difference. The findings indicate that Australians hold somewhat punitive attitudes, with rural respondents being significantly more punitive than urban respondents. Moreover, increased fear of crime and a lack of confidence in the criminal justice system moderate the difference in punitive attitudes across rural and urban areas. The findings provide support for the role of spatiality in shaping attitudes, including those towards crime and punishment. The practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. • Rural Australians are significantly more punitive than urban Australians. • Internal attribution of crime predicted punitive attitudes in urban areas. • Perceptions of crime predicted punitive attitudes in rural areas. • Fear of crime moderates differences in punitive attitudes. • Lack of confidence in the justice system moderates punitive attitudes differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103740
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punitive attitudes in Australia: Investigating the rural-urban divide

Susan Watt, Kyle Mulrooney, Caitlin B. Davey
2 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
9.66
article

Punitive attitudes in Australia: Investigating the rural-urban divide

Susan Watt, Kyle Mulrooney, Caitlin B. Davey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research exploring punitive attitudes across different geographic locations is limited. Available research suggests that rural residents may be less tolerant of crime and more likely to hold punitive attitudes when compared to their urban counterparts. However, we have little understanding of this difference. Drawing on survey data from a representative sample of the Australian public (Urban 77.1 %, N = 401 and Rural 22.9 %, N = 119), this study explores differences in punitive attitudes among rural and urban Australians and examines the factors contributing to this difference. The findings indicate that Australians hold somewhat punitive attitudes, with rural respondents being significantly more punitive than urban respondents. Moreover, increased fear of crime and a lack of confidence in the criminal justice system moderate the difference in punitive attitudes across rural and urban areas. The findings provide support for the role of spatiality in shaping attitudes, including those towards crime and punishment. The practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. • Rural Australians are significantly more punitive than urban Australians. • Internal attribution of crime predicted punitive attitudes in urban areas. • Perceptions of crime predicted punitive attitudes in rural areas. • Fear of crime moderates differences in punitive attitudes. • Lack of confidence in the justice system moderates punitive attitudes differences.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 119
Griffith University (AU), University of New England (AU)
University of New England
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Rural development and sustainability
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.