Integrating the disconnected: enhancing wetland restoration by uniting invasive species management and native revegetation

Restoring plant‐invaded ecosystems is a significant challenge for global efforts to restore ecosystem function. In theory and in practice, restoration of plant communities is commonly divided into two distinct steps: management (reduction of invaders) and revegetation (establishing desired native plant communities). Despite both being grounded in ecological principles and contributing to ecosystem recovery, the disconnect between management and revegetation likely results in reduced restoration success and highlights the need for integrated approaches that “de‐silo” invader management and revegetation. Each practice has a unique history and context and is typically implemented at different spatial and temporal scales. Still, by reviewing the literature on these topics, we demonstrate how lessons learned from management and revegetation can be used to improve each other. We focus on wetlands, which provide critical ecosystem services but are comparably under‐researched, limiting wetland‐specific, science‐based restoration guidance. Extrapolating from research and practice in terrestrial ecosystems, as is often done, is complicated by the unique characteristics of wetlands, including the predominance of long‐lived, habitat‐forming perennials and persistent invasions. We argue that by integrating management and revegetation using common ecological principles, restoration outcomes can be improved and operational efficiencies gained. These insights also apply to other invaded ecosystems, where integrating management and revegetation will help meet restoration goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70097
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating the disconnected: enhancing wetland restoration by uniting invasive species management and native revegetation

Stephen M. Hovick, Carrie Reinhardt Adams, Karin M. Kettenring
4 citations
Restoration Ecology
Environmental Conservation and Management
9.69
article

Integrating the disconnected: enhancing wetland restoration by uniting invasive species management and native revegetation

Stephen M. Hovick, Carrie Reinhardt Adams, Karin M. Kettenring
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Restoring plant‐invaded ecosystems is a significant challenge for global efforts to restore ecosystem function. In theory and in practice, restoration of plant communities is commonly divided into two distinct steps: management (reduction of invaders) and revegetation (establishing desired native plant communities). Despite both being grounded in ecological principles and contributing to ecosystem recovery, the disconnect between management and revegetation likely results in reduced restoration success and highlights the need for integrated approaches that “de‐silo” invader management and revegetation. Each practice has a unique history and context and is typically implemented at different spatial and temporal scales. Still, by reviewing the literature on these topics, we demonstrate how lessons learned from management and revegetation can be used to improve each other. We focus on wetlands, which provide critical ecosystem services but are comparably under‐researched, limiting wetland‐specific, science‐based restoration guidance. Extrapolating from research and practice in terrestrial ecosystems, as is often done, is complicated by the unique characteristics of wetlands, including the predominance of long‐lived, habitat‐forming perennials and persistent invasions. We argue that by integrating management and revegetation using common ecological principles, restoration outcomes can be improved and operational efficiencies gained. These insights also apply to other invaded ecosystems, where integrating management and revegetation will help meet restoration goals.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(5)
Utah State University (US), University of Florida (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental Conservation and Management
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating the disconnected: enhancing wetland restoration by uniting invasive species management and native revegetation — Stephen M. Hovick, Carrie Reinhardt Adams, et al. · Restoration Ecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS