Managing predators on livestock producing properties in South Africa and Western Australia – producer perspectives

Context Predation impacts livestock farming enterprises worldwide. In South Africa and Western Australia, native and non-native predators negatively impact sheep and cattle farming enterprises. Aims We hoped to compare the perspectives on predator impacts of livestock producers in relation to livestock predation in South Africa and Western Australia. Methods Online and in-person surveys consisting of 26 questions were posed to farmers and pastoralists in both countries. The questions related to land ownership, property size, livestock management, predation impact (financial and livestock losses), control of predators, and other impacts on productivity. Key results Livestock production properties are of a similar size and stocking rate in both countries, but Western Australia has some very large stations. Predation impacts on livestock production are felt in both countries, with South Africa having a larger array of predators, resulting in higher financial impacts. Despite control tools being similar in both countries, deployment of the tools differed. Conclusions Losses to predators are higher in South Africa as their predator management is localised and reactive to predation, whereas Western Australia has a proactive landscape-scale approach to predator control through Recognised Biosecurity Groups. Implications Predators impact farming enterprises in both countries, but the number of predators and the use of available control methods influence the level of impact the predators have on the productivity of farms in both Western Australia and South Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Production Science
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/an25046
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing predators on livestock producing properties in South Africa and Western Australia – producer perspectives

Haemish Melville, Tracey L. Kreplins
Animal Production Science
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Managing predators on livestock producing properties in South Africa and Western Australia – producer perspectives

Haemish Melville, Tracey L. Kreplins
article en

Abstract

Context Predation impacts livestock farming enterprises worldwide. In South Africa and Western Australia, native and non-native predators negatively impact sheep and cattle farming enterprises. Aims We hoped to compare the perspectives on predator impacts of livestock producers in relation to livestock predation in South Africa and Western Australia. Methods Online and in-person surveys consisting of 26 questions were posed to farmers and pastoralists in both countries. The questions related to land ownership, property size, livestock management, predation impact (financial and livestock losses), control of predators, and other impacts on productivity. Key results Livestock production properties are of a similar size and stocking rate in both countries, but Western Australia has some very large stations. Predation impacts on livestock production are felt in both countries, with South Africa having a larger array of predators, resulting in higher financial impacts. Despite control tools being similar in both countries, deployment of the tools differed. Conclusions Losses to predators are higher in South Africa as their predator management is localised and reactive to predation, whereas Western Australia has a proactive landscape-scale approach to predator control through Recognised Biosecurity Groups. Implications Predators impact farming enterprises in both countries, but the number of predators and the use of available control methods influence the level of impact the predators have on the productivity of farms in both Western Australia and South Africa.

Animal Production ScienceVol. 65(9)
University of South Africa (ZA), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.