Effects of by-product feed inclusion in a grass hay-based diet on nutrient disappearance, total gas and methane production, rumen fermentation and protozoal populations in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC)

Context Dietary manipulation can reduce enteric methane in beef cattle but limited options exist for perennial forage-based diets. Aims An artificial rumen system (RUSITEC) was used to assess the effects of including quinoa screenings, flax screenings, and sunflower screenings in a grass hay-based diet on nutrient disappearance, total gas production (GP), methane (CH4) production, ruminal fermentation, and protozoa populations. Methods The experiment was a randomized complete block design with four treatments assigned to 16 fermenters (n = 4 per treatment) in two RUSITEC apparatuses. The control diet was timothy grass hay only, with by-product treatments of grass hay plus quinoa screenings, flax screenings, or sunflower screenings, at inclusion rates of 21.4%, 11.2%, and 12.3% diet DM, respectively. The study duration was 15 days, with an 8-day adaptation period followed by a 7-day sample collection period. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS with fixed effects of treatment, day of sampling (repeated measure), and their interaction and with RUSITEC and fermenter as random effects. Key results Compared to the control, the inclusion of quinoa and flax had no effect (P > 0.05) on dry matter (DMD) or organic matter disappearance; however, these were lower (P < 0.001) than sunflower. Sunflower and quinoa did not affect (P > 0.05) rumen fluid propionate production compared to the control; however, propionate production was increased (P < 0.05) with flax. Additionally, sunflower decreased (P = 0.044) rumen fluid acetate production as compared to the control, quinoa and flax groups. Sunflower, compared to the control, had fewer (P < 0.05) protozoa. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of by-products on GP (L day−1). Sunflower reduced (P < 0.05) CH4 by 42% (mg g−1) DM incubated and 31% (mg g−1) DMD, whereas quinoa and flax had similar CH4 production to the control. Conclusions This study suggested sunflower screenings have the potential to decrease CH4 when included in a grass hay-based diet. Implications Methane reduction was accompanied by reduced DMD, therefore, animal performance may be negatively impacted. Although quinoa and flax did not reduce CH4 production, they demonstrated potential to supplement hay-based diets without decreasing DMD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Production Science
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/an24186
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of by-product feed inclusion in a grass hay-based diet on nutrient disappearance, total gas and methane production, rumen fermentation and protozoal populations in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC)

S. Robinson, K. M. Wittenberg, Tim Angus McAllister, A.M. Saleem et al.
Animal Production Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Effects of by-product feed inclusion in a grass hay-based diet on nutrient disappearance, total gas and methane production, rumen fermentation and protozoal populations in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC)

S. Robinson, K. M. Wittenberg, Tim Angus McAllister, A.M. Saleem, Paul Tamayao, G. H. Crow, Emma J J McGeough, Kim Ominski
article en

Abstract

Context Dietary manipulation can reduce enteric methane in beef cattle but limited options exist for perennial forage-based diets. Aims An artificial rumen system (RUSITEC) was used to assess the effects of including quinoa screenings, flax screenings, and sunflower screenings in a grass hay-based diet on nutrient disappearance, total gas production (GP), methane (CH4) production, ruminal fermentation, and protozoa populations. Methods The experiment was a randomized complete block design with four treatments assigned to 16 fermenters (n = 4 per treatment) in two RUSITEC apparatuses. The control diet was timothy grass hay only, with by-product treatments of grass hay plus quinoa screenings, flax screenings, or sunflower screenings, at inclusion rates of 21.4%, 11.2%, and 12.3% diet DM, respectively. The study duration was 15 days, with an 8-day adaptation period followed by a 7-day sample collection period. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS with fixed effects of treatment, day of sampling (repeated measure), and their interaction and with RUSITEC and fermenter as random effects. Key results Compared to the control, the inclusion of quinoa and flax had no effect (P > 0.05) on dry matter (DMD) or organic matter disappearance; however, these were lower (P < 0.001) than sunflower. Sunflower and quinoa did not affect (P > 0.05) rumen fluid propionate production compared to the control; however, propionate production was increased (P < 0.05) with flax. Additionally, sunflower decreased (P = 0.044) rumen fluid acetate production as compared to the control, quinoa and flax groups. Sunflower, compared to the control, had fewer (P < 0.05) protozoa. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of by-products on GP (L day−1). Sunflower reduced (P < 0.05) CH4 by 42% (mg g−1) DM incubated and 31% (mg g−1) DMD, whereas quinoa and flax had similar CH4 production to the control. Conclusions This study suggested sunflower screenings have the potential to decrease CH4 when included in a grass hay-based diet. Implications Methane reduction was accompanied by reduced DMD, therefore, animal performance may be negatively impacted. Although quinoa and flax did not reduce CH4 production, they demonstrated potential to supplement hay-based diets without decreasing DMD.

Animal Production ScienceVol. 65(9)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), South Valley University (EG), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.