AI-driven income inequality and preferences for redistribution

Theoretical and early empirical work in economics suggest that commercial deployment of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) can have significant implications for economic inequality. This paper provides the first empirical insights on how may people’s preferences for redistribution respond to such AI-induced inequalities. In a stated choice experiment, we let participants ( n = 750) choose their preferred income distributions in scenarios where initial income differences can vs. cannot be attributed to the use of AI technology. Preregistered data analyses indicate that participants’ preferences shift towards more equal income distributions in scenarios with AI. However, the shift is not dramatic and on its own does not point to a need for a fundamental restructuring of redistributive policies. In exploratory analyses we test whether participants’ previous experience with AI, their beliefs about AI’s future economic impacts, or their political preferences moderate the treatment effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Analysis and Policy
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.06.019
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-driven income inequality and preferences for redistribution

Gloria Amaris, Štěpán Veselý
Economic Analysis and Policy
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

AI-driven income inequality and preferences for redistribution

Gloria Amaris, Štěpán Veselý
article en

Abstract

Theoretical and early empirical work in economics suggest that commercial deployment of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) can have significant implications for economic inequality. This paper provides the first empirical insights on how may people’s preferences for redistribution respond to such AI-induced inequalities. In a stated choice experiment, we let participants ( n = 750) choose their preferred income distributions in scenarios where initial income differences can vs. cannot be attributed to the use of AI technology. Preregistered data analyses indicate that participants’ preferences shift towards more equal income distributions in scenarios with AI. However, the shift is not dramatic and on its own does not point to a need for a fundamental restructuring of redistributive policies. In exploratory analyses we test whether participants’ previous experience with AI, their beliefs about AI’s future economic impacts, or their political preferences moderate the treatment effect.

Economic Analysis and PolicyVol. 87
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.