Comparison of PLTS-2000 and the magnetic field fluctuation thermometer at LNE-Cnam

Abstract This paper presents a comparison between the provisional low-temperature scale of 2000 (PLTS-2000) and the magnetic field fluctuation thermometer (MFFT) scales, as realized at LNE-Cnam. The comparison was carried out using three different realizations (i.e. different melting pressure sensors) of PLTS-2000 and a magnetic field fluctuation thermometer operated with a long measurement time (about 3 h) and a more precise power spectral density model of the MFFT response that included an offset term to account for the background noise in the MFFT electronics. The comparison over the range between 8 mK and 1 K shows that the PLTS- 2000 and MFFT scales agree within about 0.2 mK. The results confirm the thermodynamic accuracy of PLTS-2000 at the same level of uncertainty, and show that, under suitable conditions, MFFT measurements can achieve comparable performance. This highlights its potential use in certain practical applications where direct realization of PLTS-2000 is not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrologia
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ade4d0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of PLTS-2000 and the magnetic field fluctuation thermometer at LNE-Cnam

Laurent Pitre, M. D. Plimmer, D. R. White, F. Sparasci et al.
2 citations
Metrologia
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
9.99
article

Comparison of PLTS-2000 and the magnetic field fluctuation thermometer at LNE-Cnam

Laurent Pitre, M. D. Plimmer, D. R. White, F. Sparasci, W. Guo, Clement Tauzin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a comparison between the provisional low-temperature scale of 2000 (PLTS-2000) and the magnetic field fluctuation thermometer (MFFT) scales, as realized at LNE-Cnam. The comparison was carried out using three different realizations (i.e. different melting pressure sensors) of PLTS-2000 and a magnetic field fluctuation thermometer operated with a long measurement time (about 3 h) and a more precise power spectral density model of the MFFT response that included an offset term to account for the background noise in the MFFT electronics. The comparison over the range between 8 mK and 1 K shows that the PLTS- 2000 and MFFT scales agree within about 0.2 mK. The results confirm the thermodynamic accuracy of PLTS-2000 at the same level of uncertainty, and show that, under suitable conditions, MFFT measurements can achieve comparable performance. This highlights its potential use in certain practical applications where direct realization of PLTS-2000 is not feasible.

MetrologiaVol. 62(4)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), Hutt Hospital (NZ), Jiangsu Institute of Metrology (CN), Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of PLTS-2000 and the magnetic field fluctuation thermometer at LNE-Cnam — Laurent Pitre, M. D. Plimmer, et al. · Metrologia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS