Students' fallacies in predicting test outcomes

Tests are an integral part of any learning process. If students do not have sufficient information on tests’ content, they may have erroneous expectations and choose a suboptimal educational strategy, which leads both to a decrease in an overall level of knowledge and academic success, and a decrease in students' motivation to make efforts in future. Our objective is to identify the factors that shape expected and actual test scores and determine the differences between them. The data were collected through a survey of students of the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University in the course “Theory of Finance” with a regression analysis as a modeling method. Students incorrectly assess their knowledge of the course, which leads to incorrect expectations. When forming expected grades for the tests, respondents focus on past achievements in other academic subjects, but no correlation between this factor and actual grades was found. At the same time, students do not consider past mistakes (the difference between actual and expected scores for the first paper) when forming expected scores for the next test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lomonosov Economics Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0130-0105-6-60-2-14
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students' fallacies in predicting test outcomes

A. G. Mirzoyan, E. A. Siniakova
Lomonosov Economics Journal
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Students' fallacies in predicting test outcomes

A. G. Mirzoyan, E. A. Siniakova
article en

Abstract

Tests are an integral part of any learning process. If students do not have sufficient information on tests’ content, they may have erroneous expectations and choose a suboptimal educational strategy, which leads both to a decrease in an overall level of knowledge and academic success, and a decrease in students' motivation to make efforts in future. Our objective is to identify the factors that shape expected and actual test scores and determine the differences between them. The data were collected through a survey of students of the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University in the course “Theory of Finance” with a regression analysis as a modeling method. Students incorrectly assess their knowledge of the course, which leads to incorrect expectations. When forming expected grades for the tests, respondents focus on past achievements in other academic subjects, but no correlation between this factor and actual grades was found. At the same time, students do not consider past mistakes (the difference between actual and expected scores for the first paper) when forming expected scores for the next test.

Lomonosov Economics JournalVol. 60(№2, 2025)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.