Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin–AVD in Older Patients With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma Enrolled on S1826

Older patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have inferior survival compared with younger patients. We report a subset analysis of older patients (60 years and older) enrolled in the phase three S1826 trial conducted by SWOG that randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage (III-IV) cHL to six cycles of nivolumab (N)-AVD or brentuximab vedotin (BV)-AVD. Of 103 enrolled patients 60 years and older, 99 were eligible. At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the 2-year progression-free survival was 89% after N-AVD (n = 50) and 64% after BV-AVD (n = 49, HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.09-0.63, 1-sided stratified log-rank <i>P</i> = .001). The 2-year OS was 96% with N-AVD versus 85% with BV-AVD (HR 0.16, 95%CI 0.03-0.75 stratified 1-sided log-rank <i>P</i> = .005). Six cycles were delivered without dose reduction in 69% on N-AVD and 26% on BV-AVD; 55% discontinued BV, and 14% discontinued nivolumab. The nonrelapse mortality was 16% with BV-AVD and 6% with N-AVD. Despite more neutropenia with N-AVD, febrile neutropenia, sepsis, and infections were higher with BV-AVD, as was peripheral neuropathy. Patient-reported outcomes of key adverse events confirmed the improved toxicity profile of N-AVD over BV-AVD. N-AVD was better tolerated and more effective than BV-AVD and is therefore a new standard of care for older patients with advanced-stage cHL fit for anthracycline-based combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-00204
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin–AVD in Older Patients With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma Enrolled on S1826

Susan K. Parsons, Hongli Li, Sonali M. Smith, Anamarija M. Perry et al.
14 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
20.60
article

Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin–AVD in Older Patients With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma Enrolled on S1826

Susan K. Parsons, Hongli Li, Sonali M. Smith, Anamarija M. Perry, Joo Y. Song, Alex Francisco Herrera, Brian T. Hess, Sharon M. Castellino, John P. Leonard, Jonathan W. Friedberg, Sairah Ahmed, Michael LeBlanc, Joseph M. Tuscano, Pallawi Torka, Andrew M. Evens, Pankaj Kumar, Brad S. Kahl, Kelly Davison, Nancy L. Bartlett, Sarah C. Rutherford, Joseph M. Unger, Carla Casulo, Ryan Jacobs
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Older patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have inferior survival compared with younger patients. We report a subset analysis of older patients (60 years and older) enrolled in the phase three S1826 trial conducted by SWOG that randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage (III-IV) cHL to six cycles of nivolumab (N)-AVD or brentuximab vedotin (BV)-AVD. Of 103 enrolled patients 60 years and older, 99 were eligible. At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the 2-year progression-free survival was 89% after N-AVD (n = 50) and 64% after BV-AVD (n = 49, HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.09-0.63, 1-sided stratified log-rank <i>P</i> = .001). The 2-year OS was 96% with N-AVD versus 85% with BV-AVD (HR 0.16, 95%CI 0.03-0.75 stratified 1-sided log-rank <i>P</i> = .005). Six cycles were delivered without dose reduction in 69% on N-AVD and 26% on BV-AVD; 55% discontinued BV, and 14% discontinued nivolumab. The nonrelapse mortality was 16% with BV-AVD and 6% with N-AVD. Despite more neutropenia with N-AVD, febrile neutropenia, sepsis, and infections were higher with BV-AVD, as was peripheral neuropathy. Patient-reported outcomes of key adverse events confirmed the improved toxicity profile of N-AVD over BV-AVD. N-AVD was better tolerated and more effective than BV-AVD and is therefore a new standard of care for older patients with advanced-stage cHL fit for anthracycline-based combination therapy.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(27)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), University of Chicago (US), Royal Victoria Hospital (CA), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Levine Cancer Institute (US), City of Hope (US), Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders (US), Illinois CancerCare (US), University of California Davis Medical Center (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), University of Rochester (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
20.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.