Trust and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract Can we trust AI? It is a question that is asked with increasing frequency and urgency as artificial intelligence becomes ever more adept at performing tasks hitherto performed almost exclusively by human beings. There are certainly reasons to be cautious, among which is the problem of understanding the inner workings of AI. Adapting themselves through machine learning, modern AIs rapidly become so complex that nobody can follow the processes by which they reach conclusions; they can be neither reliably predicted in advance nor easily examined in retrospect. It is this concern that I shall address. Transparency is often considered an important requirement for trustworthy AI and so its absence is commonly recognised as a potential objection to its adoption. Sometimes referred to as the ‘black box’ problem, it points out that we can hardly ever completely understand how an AI works and suggests that such opacity precludes trust. This is a conclusion I believe we ought to resist. The nature of AI as a black box should not entirely prevent us from trusting it. My conclusion is modest: I do not attempt to put to rest all potential concerns with trusting AI, but only deal with the specific obstacle of its opacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00916-2
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence

Thomas J. Mitchell
10 citations
Philosophy & Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
18.93
article

Trust and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence

Thomas J. Mitchell
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Can we trust AI? It is a question that is asked with increasing frequency and urgency as artificial intelligence becomes ever more adept at performing tasks hitherto performed almost exclusively by human beings. There are certainly reasons to be cautious, among which is the problem of understanding the inner workings of AI. Adapting themselves through machine learning, modern AIs rapidly become so complex that nobody can follow the processes by which they reach conclusions; they can be neither reliably predicted in advance nor easily examined in retrospect. It is this concern that I shall address. Transparency is often considered an important requirement for trustworthy AI and so its absence is commonly recognised as a potential objection to its adoption. Sometimes referred to as the ‘black box’ problem, it points out that we can hardly ever completely understand how an AI works and suggests that such opacity precludes trust. This is a conclusion I believe we ought to resist. The nature of AI as a black box should not entirely prevent us from trusting it. My conclusion is modest: I do not attempt to put to rest all potential concerns with trusting AI, but only deal with the specific obstacle of its opacity.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(3)
University of Oxford (GB), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
18.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence — Thomas J. Mitchell · Philosophy & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS