It is time to acknowledge and act on the importance of power in integrated knowledge translation

Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) has emerged as an approach to research centered on collaboration between researchers and knowledge users, particularly in health research. There has been a growing focus on power within the IKT literature, especially the concern that overlooking power inequities within IKT partnerships may reproduce forms of knowledge production and dissemination that do not align with IKT's aspirations of shared decision making to produce useful and usable research findings. However, there remain significant gaps in our understanding of how to address and attend to power in IKT. The lack of conceptual precision around power complicates these efforts. In this commentary, we draw on existing literatures that have grappled with the notion of power to sensitize those who study and engage in IKT to the importance of power and to identify helpful ways of thinking about power in IKT. We propose that it is time to not only acknowledge the importance of power in IKT but also to develop empirically based strategies through which the many dimensions of power can be identified and navigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01353-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It is time to acknowledge and act on the importance of power in integrated knowledge translation

Iain Lang, Bev Holmes, Anita Kothari, Leigha Comer et al.
2 citations
Health Research Policy and Systems
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
article

It is time to acknowledge and act on the importance of power in integrated knowledge translation

Iain Lang, Bev Holmes, Anita Kothari, Leigha Comer, Chris McCutcheon, Ian D. Graham
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) has emerged as an approach to research centered on collaboration between researchers and knowledge users, particularly in health research. There has been a growing focus on power within the IKT literature, especially the concern that overlooking power inequities within IKT partnerships may reproduce forms of knowledge production and dissemination that do not align with IKT's aspirations of shared decision making to produce useful and usable research findings. However, there remain significant gaps in our understanding of how to address and attend to power in IKT. The lack of conceptual precision around power complicates these efforts. In this commentary, we draw on existing literatures that have grappled with the notion of power to sensitize those who study and engage in IKT to the importance of power and to identify helpful ways of thinking about power in IKT. We propose that it is time to not only acknowledge the importance of power in IKT but also to develop empirically based strategies through which the many dimensions of power can be identified and navigated.

Health Research Policy and SystemsVol. 23(1)
Western University (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Michael Smith Health Research BC (CA), Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

It is time to acknowledge and act on the importance of power in integrated knowledge translation — Iain Lang, Bev Holmes, et al. · Health Research Policy and Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS